A blog by Tim George. Follow my other work at http://www.tewahanui.nz/by/tim.george, http://www.denofgeek.com/authors/tim-george, and theatrescenes.co.nz.
Tuesday, 22 August 2023
Freddie as F.R.O.7 (Jon Acevski, 1992)
Sunday, 20 August 2023
NZIFF 2023: Inside (Vasilis Katsoupis, 2023)
On his latest job, Nemo finds himself sealed inside a hi-tech penthouse apartment.
Without food or water, and with no escape route, Nemo is trapped.
The locked-room thriller is one of my favourite genres - there is something about the limitations of the setting - and the focus it can give to characters in a specific world - which gets me excited.
Inside takes the limitations of the sub-genre to the next level.
As time passes, he converts the futuristic apartment into a primitive dwelling - where food, water and refuse take precedence.
As his escape attempts become more sophisticated, so do Nemo’s artistic instincts. At first, Nemo's focus is primal - get food and water.
Because he plays it so earnestly, the film’s ironies work. A more overtly self-aware performance would have exposed the film’s fairly obvious themes.
Saturday, 19 August 2023
Sahara (Zoltan Korda, 1943)
Following defeat in the desert, Sgt. Joe Gunn (Humphrey Bogart) leads a group of survivors across the Sahara back toward Alexandria.
Arriving at an oasis, the survivors find themselves under siege by a larger German unit who want to secure the precious source of water for an advance on Egypt.
Can Joe and the others hold them off?
Maybe it was the bad aftertaste of Across the Pacific. Maybe it was the heavy signalling of the ideological conflicts of the WW2 epic. Whatever it was, it took awhile for me to warm up to Sahara.
It is a WW2 movie made and released during WW2, which makes it more interesting. This is made for a wartime audience as a moral booster, so there are certain elements that feel a tad obvious: the characters break down into a cross-section of different participants in the conflict. The German pilot they capture (Kurt Kreuger) is pure evil, a duplicitous killer who refuses to accept his fate. He is contrasted with the Italian prisoner, J. Carrol Naish’s Giuseppe, who is given a family, and eventually sacrifices himself for his new friends.
There is a slight melodramatic undercurrent to the character dynamics, but that is just a feature - the characters might be archetypes, but they are all solidly constructed, and well-played.
Once the film turns into a siege narrative, we have spent enough time with these characters that their actions (and deaths) carry real weight.
While Bogart is reliably taciturn as the reluctant leader, the real standout is Louis Mercier as Jean Leroux, "Frenchie". He brings a charisma and humour that - while it works for this movie - felt like a tip toward the men-on-a-mission adventure ensembles of the sixties.
The film is well-photographed by Rudolph Maté, highlighting the actors’ burned, exhausted faces.
Directed by Zoltan Korda (brother of British writer-producer Alexander Korda), Sahara is more nuanced than it initially appears - the desert is unforgiving to everyone in the movie. The Germans are the antagonists, but by the end of the film, they are presented as pitifully human - crumpled against the sand, blearily staring at our heroes’ fortifications while the cries of their wounded fill dead air.
Sahara is probably the secret gem of the festival. An effective war picture more than a Bogart showcase, it is worth a look.
Related
World War Two
BONDIFICATING: The gift of Bond’s death
The latest season of the James Bond Cocktail Hour podcast is out now!
Sunday, 13 August 2023
To Have and Have Not (Howard Hawks, 1944)
Captain Harry Morgan and his friend Eddie run a fishing boat out of Fort-de-France, the island’s main port. The port is also a hotbed of violence as the Vichy officials battle with rebels who support the French French and the Allies.
Harry tries to remain neutral, but he finds his status harder to maintain when economic hardship forces him to accept a fee to get French resistance fighters onto the island.
As he romances an American stranger, Slim (Lauren Bacall), Harry is drawn deeper into the war effort.
Can he survive?
Proof that a movie featuring a small cast talking in a hotel can be exciting, To Have and Have Not is easily one of the best movies in the festival.
While there are similarities to Casablanca - as there have been with the other films in the Academy’s schedule - To Have and Have Not stands out.
Like the 1942 film, the dynamics of friendship, love, and loyalty are key to the film’s action and suspense.
The introduction of Lauren Bacall adds a welcome addition of sex to the familiar romance. The catalyst for the duo’s legendary on and offscreen relationship, Bacall’s chemistry with Bogart is palpable throughout.
Set in 1940 but released four years later, the film is a parable for America’s position between the Allies and the Axis at the outset of the war. Harry Morgan is a professional who minds his business and tries to keep out of the spheres of either the Vichy authorities or the rebels trying to unseat them.
This movie is great, but watching it after Sirocco highlighted its strengths. This movie is less interesting for its plot than its focus on the relationships between the characters - and how the pressure of outside forces brings out their true selves.
Unlike Bergman’s angelic Ilsa, Bacall’s Slim is a born schemer - she has had to find her own way in the world, and bears no guilt or divided loyalties. She also sees through hypocrisy and personas, sizing up Harry as soon as they catch sight of one another.
In a neat reversal, it is Bogart who is the object of desire - although Bacall’s performance ensures this view is imbued with a little more lust than Rick’s.
Most of the film’s action takes place in tight interiors - or interiors rendered claustrophobic by crowds of people. There is a constant sense of surveillance, and of benign under siege. There is also a sense of community, of the bustle of everyday life, of people finding solidarity, joy and romance together.
On paper, To Have and Have Not might come across as stagey, but the finished film has the pace and dynamism of an action movie - except the characters trade barbs instead of bullets.
There is a subset of movies which I love where the world of the movie is so vivid, you would want to hang out and marinate in the ambience. To Have and Have Not is now one of those movies.
I wish I had caught it sooner.
Related
Thursday, 10 August 2023
The Russians are Coming, The Russians are Coming (Norman Jewison, 1966)
A Soviet submarine runs aground off a small island off the eastern seaboard of the United States.
A small team is sent ashore to secure a boat to help tow the submarine back to sea.
When rumours of their unwelcome visitors spread around the island, the small community is thrown into a panic.
Believing that they are being invaded, a mob assembles to repel the invaders.
As the island descends into chaos, the Soviet sailors struggle to maintain their cover and find a suitable boat.
Can they complete their mission before starting World War 3?
“It does not make sense to hate people - it is such a waste of time”
Sadly, sometimes it takes a performer’s death to get you to take a deeper look at their work.
Alan Arkin was one of those actors who made everything he was in just a little better.
The movie that got me interested in him was his role as Harry Roat Jr. in 1967’s Wait Until Dark.
When he passed away, I wanted to dig into his filmography.
Directed by Norman Jewison, 1966’s The Russians are Coming, The Russians are Coming is a rather humanist take on the Cold War.
The whole movie is based on misunderstanding and human error, starting with the catalyst for the movie - the submarine captain’s arrogant desire to get a closer look at the enemy coast.
The film is premised on making sure we as an audience can track these different groups without difficulty.
While the Russian characters speak their language without subtitles, it is easy to track what they are saying.
At no point are they cast as a threat to the island.
The Russians just want to get home, and the film portrays them as more hapless than competent.
There is a slapstick quality to the group - piling in and out of cars; the stilted rapport between Rozanov (Alan Arkin) and Alexei (John Phillip Law) as they try to divert suspicions of local family the Whittakers (Carl Reiner and Eva Marie Saint); Law hiding in a field after he loses his gun to Reiner’s Walt.
Meanwhile, the locals are portrayed as easily swayed into violent groupthink. The film turns into an elaborate game of telephone, as the locals build their visitors into an existential threat.
Despite the broad brush of the group scenes, the film remains sharpest in its portrayal of individual characters.
There is a satirical edge to the Whittakers’ domestic scenes, as the Americans try to deal with their personal issues (Walt is a writer struggling with writer’s block), while dealing with a crisis they cannot comprehend.
The movie is funny because of how it undermines the hysteria of its title. Instead it treats the town’s increasing panic with a comic - though empathetic - distance.
It pokes fun at the ways in which fear can lead to violence (such as the way a mob quickly forms around a fascistic leader, played by Paul Ford). In 2023, this aspect of the movie feels evergreen, as Fendall (Ford) riles the town’s people to fulfil his own delusions of combat.
As the beleaguered leader of the Russian expedition, Alan Arkin is a model of comic exasperation. A veteran of Second City, he brings a razor-sharp comic timing, without going into buffoonish caricature.
John Phillip Law is also great as the earnest sailor Alexei, who forms a bond with local girl Alison (Andrea Dromm).
Reiner brings a weary groundedness to Walt, while the great Brian Keith is comically unimpressed as the island’s sheriff.
Despite the dark underpinnings, the film is ultimately rather hopeful about humanity, particularly in the gentle romance between Law’s seaman and Dromm’s local.
The third act is rather tense as an enraged Walt tries to gun down Rozanov, while US authorities scramble to attack the sub. Instead of an accidental nuclear war, the film ends with a show of basic humanity, and the two communities leaving on good terms.
A gem.
If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!