Wednesday, 29 September 2021

Night of the Running Man (Mark L. Lester, 1995)

Former gambler Jerry (Andrew McCarthy) is a cab driver sleepwalking through life. When a mysterious suitcase filled with money ends up in his taxi, Jerry sees it as his ticket out.


But the money belongs to the mob - and they want it back...



What a breath of fresh rancid air. I have a particular affinity for early nineties action thrillers, particularly when they are man-on-the-run riffs like this. A favourite of this type is the 1991 thriller Run starring future TV hunk Patrick Dempsey.


This movie is an airport thriller on celluloid - it is designed to move quickly from scene to scene so that you do not think about tiresome things like ‘reality’ and ‘logic’. I am not sure I would have enjoyed the movie as much if I was not watching it 2021. A movie like this would not be made now, and if it was it would be a Netflix movie that would be forgotten in five minutes.


While context does play a factor, there is blunt workmanship to Night of the Running Man that works in its favour. It almost plays like a downbeat version of Lester’s Commando (1985), in its pared-down narrative economy and sense of forward momentum.


Its pulp credentials are evident from the off - villain Scott Glenn is introduced in bed with a woman. They have been involved for awhile, but he likes to keep things distant. When she tries to learn more about him, he breaks her neck. Accompanied by a loud sound effect, it is a ridiculously graphic incident that betrays the crassness of the movie. There is a veneer of excess to the violence in the movie that pushes it into the realm of pulp. It is too broad to be taken seriously but not explicit enough to read as docudrama.


While the movie is overheated, it orbits around an ice-cold centre: Scott Glenn as the Terminator-like enforcer Eckhart. 


While Andrew McCarthy is the titular lead, it is Glenn who is the main reason to watch. A cold-blooded killer who is a born hunter, he is an almost-supernatural antagonist who will stop at nothing to kill whoever gets in his way. 


While the character could have been silly or a blank slate, Glenn’s minimalist performance is terrifying. In a movie that reads like a missing Mike Hammer, Glenn’s subtlety reads with more impact. There is something almost diabolical about Eckhart as he goes about his business - an inevitability conveyed in Glenn’s little smirk that only makes his sudden explosions of violence more terrifying. Glenn is one of cinema’s great underplayers, and having him play the equivalent of a human bomb gives the movie a tension I do not think would be there otherwise. 


It helps that the script introduces Eckhart through his actions rather than dialogue - aside from his indifference to human life, he is also a terrifyingly accurate human lie detector. The film is at its best when focused on Eckhart interrogating some poor soul who is trying to cover for Jerry. Glenn does not betray any deeper emotions, letting the audience put together what is going on behind his Spinx-like visage. 


A good action movie is only as good as its villain, and Eckhart is a great bad guy. He felt like a missing Michael Mann character - a spiritual sibling to De Niro’s Neil McCauley (Heat) or Cruise’s Vincent (Collateral). That feels like too much praise but Glenn’s performance is definitely worthy, even if the movie cannot match it.


While narratively functional, the movie’s lack of meat is not purely economical - most of the women in the movie die, except for a helpful nurse (Janet Gunn) who comes to our hero’s aid. She gets a few moments of agency, but that goes away once she joins Jerry on the run. Her transformation into a love interest quickly turns her into a damsel in distress. 


This final cliche is slightly blunted by the characterisation of Jerry. He is never presented as a physically imposing or aggressive figure. While he is active in improvising his way out of trouble, these actions are mostly reactive, as he finds his attempts to flee Eckhart are foiled at every turn. McCarthy is fine in the role, but it feels like the script is expecting the performance to convey a sense of past bad luck and poor choices - but McCarthy is a little too clean-cut (even with the beard).


A solid little thriller, Night of the Running Man is worth checking out - especially for Scott Glenn’s terrifying performance.

If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on iTunes, or wherever you get your podcasts.

BITE-SIZED REVIEW: Capricorn One (Peter Hyams, 1978)

When technical flaws scupper their planned expedition to Mars, NASA's brain trust decide to engage in an elaborate deception: blackmailing a crew of astronauts, they will fake a landing on the red planet.

When the astronauts (James Brolin, Sam Waterson and OJ Simpson) escape the studio, their former employer is determined to eliminate them before they can get to the outside world.

Will they succeed?

A great premise that launched a thousand conspiracies, Capricorn One was an early credit for Peter Hyams, a filmmaker with a long career across a variety of genres: science fiction (Outland, 2010, TimeCop), action (Sudden Death, Enemies Closer), horror (The Relic) and comedy (Running Scared).


With his constant hopping between genres, Hyams is the kind of filmmaker I generally gravitate towards. 


But like the space expedition at the centre of this movie, there is something not quite right with Capricorn One.


There is something cold and aimless at the heart of this movie. There are plot movies that are designed to build tension but the pacing is off - every scene feels 20 seconds too long, and if the scene involves any kind of exposition, it feels even longer.


What makes it frustrating is that you can see the elements of the recipe for suspense. The film cuts between the astronauts and a disgraced journalist (Elliott Gould) on the outside who begins to unpeel the conspiracy. Gould is always good value, but his scenes never come off - the tension is just not there. 


Even the stuff which should be exciting - the astronaut’s escape across the desert, never quite builds steam. The final airplane chase is decent with some impressive stunt-work (and a scenery-chewing cameo from Telly Savalas), but it is too little too late.


The acting is generally okay, although the actors are hung out to dry by long-winded dialogue scenes that go on a few passages too long.


Despite being a paranoid thriller, Capricorn One is not that paranoid and only occasionally thrilling.


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on iTunes, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Tuesday, 28 September 2021

Checked out the latest episodes of the James Bond Cocktail Hour?

  The third season of the James Bond Cocktail Hour continues!



The episodes are as follows:


No Time To Die Trailer 2 review


Nobody Lives For Ever (by John Gardner)


How to introduce James Bond


Casino Royale '06 Part One & Two


McClory v Fleming


Thunderball (novel)


Remembering Sean Connery


Thunderball (Terence Young, 1965)


A look at Kevin McClory's Warhead (1976)


Never Say Never Again (Irvin Kershner, 1983)


Remixing Thunderball


The Hunt for Red October


The Man with the Golden Gun


Bond Tropes Discussion


Ranking the James Bond ski chases


Die Another Day (2 hour cut)


Patriot Games


Clear and Present Danger


The Man Who Almost Killed James Bond


A View To A Kill


Sum of All Fears


Jack Ryan - Shadow Recruit


Executive Decision


VARGR


State of the Franchise


Skyfall (Part One)


Happy & Glorious - Bond at the Olympics


Skyfall (Part Two)


This month's episodes are:


We saw Casino Royale on the big screen!


(Final) Trailer Talk


The Liquidator (John Gardner book)


The Liquidator (film)


You can listen to these and future episodes wherever you listen to podcasts!


Follow the podcast on IG @jbchpod and on Twitter @jbchpod007.


Monday, 27 September 2021

BITE-SIZED REVIEW: No Contest (Paul Lynch, 1995)

Terrorists have taken over the Miss Galaxy beauty contest and it is up to the show's host, martial arts star Sharon Bell (Shannon Tweed) to defeat them and save the contestants.

A Canadian production, No Contest is not particularly good or exciting, but it rides the line thanks to competent deployment of narrative and character cliches, and some interesting swerves.


I want to emphasize that this movie is not technically a ‘good’ movie, but it never veers off into technical incompetence or the singularity of outsider art like The Room.


This is entirely subjective, but from my perspective the movie is watchable because of low expectations.  


The movie is a fairly predictable rip of Die Hard - except it makes enough changes to justify its limited resources. It is also the only Die Hard riff I have seen based around a woman. And Andrew Dice Clay is not bad as the urbane villain. 


The cast are all over the place, but all within a similar bandwidth. Shannon Tweed is pretty wooden in the lead, but she does not take you out of the movie. Robert Davi is solid as her man on the outside. And Roddy Piper is perfectly cast as a scumbag villain. 


The action is fairly low-key, but I spent the movie impressed by how many different parts of the hotel the film managed to show. The movie is small, but they ring as much scope as they can out of the limited canvas. And the filmmakers do not exploit Tweed’s previous career in erotic thrillers - indeed, they use the tease of nudity as a misdirect to get the action started.


It’s not great, but as an exercise in making the most of what you have, it is interesting.

If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on iTunes, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Sunday, 26 September 2021

THE JAMES BOND COCKTAIL HOUR (blog edition): Ranking the Bond novels

Here is my ranking of the Bond novels that we have covered on the James Bond Cocktail hour podcast. While reviewing the movies is fun, it has been the books which I think have made for the most interesting discussions. If you have not already, you can check out our reviews at the link at the bottom of this review. 

  1. Moonraker (Ian Fleming, 1955): Fleming at his best. A clean, simple plot with well-drawn characters. A fun mystery element, some OTT touches and a great Bond girl make this the best literary Bond

 

  1. Colonel Sun (Kingsley Amis, 1968): An enjoyable continuation and deepening of the Bond formula, with a well-realised antagonist and a great cast of characters. If I have a criticism it is that the villain’s scheme is not weird enough


  1. Octopussy & The Living Daylights (Fleming, 1966): The titular stories are great - TLD is a great thriller and character piece, while Octopussy uses Bond as a jumping off point for a darker tale about human nature. ‘Property of a Lady’ is bogged down by too much description, but the set-piece is cool


  1. Casino Royale  (Fleming, 1953): Simple plot, small scale. It is a great intro but I like Bond stories where I can invest in the relationships. I think the movie version deepens and re-contextualises a lot of the problems I have. 


  1. Carte Blanche  (Jeffrey Deaver, 2011): The storytelling does feel contrived, but the characters are all great and kudos for coming up with a Bond villain who feels OTT without using race or disability to make him Other. The issue is that Deaver writes himself into situations and then has to contrive his way out. It is a law of diminishing returns, but I enjoyed the ride. 


  1. From Russia With Love (Fleming, 1957): Same plot idea as Thunderball - we know more than the characters, but they use it for suspense. Suffers from racism and sexism that makes Kerim Bey in particular very unsympathetic. 


  1. Thunderball (Fleming, 1961): The plot is fine, the Bond girl is good but I always hit a wall midway through this book. Is it because we know what has happened, and we are just waiting for Bond to put it together?


  1. Win, Lose or Die  (John Gardner, 1989): It is Die Hard on an aircraft carrier. It is a mess but with some rearranging, it could be great. This one is fun garbage. 


  1. Nobody Lives For Ever (Gardner, 1986): Great premise, great locations, and I always like a guillotine. But squandered.


  1. Zero Minus Ten (Raymond Benson, 1997): Nothing wrong with it, but it is just dull and lacks any kind tension or atmosphere. It is just not fun.


  1. Devil May Care (Sebastian Faulks, 2008): To hear my and Hugh's thoughts on this book, you will have to wait for a future episode of the podcast...


  1. No Deals, Mr Bond (Gardner, 1987): This one is just a series of plot contrivances that go nowhere. The manhunt at the end is a fun idea, but Bond using gadgets to get out of trouble ruins it. 


  1. Solo  (William Boyd, 2013): This book boils down to a great idea. What if a James Bond villain is being protected by MI6/The Americans. And it does not follow through on that - James Bond does not go solo. You give me a book called Solo, then have Bond go solo. My other big problem is its failure of nerve - this book wants to talk about Africa’s relationship with its colonial past, and how those forces are still dominant, but it also fetishizes its one African character as a sex object and reduces her to a sacrificial lamb. She has no personality and is completely beholden to the movements of the plot. That smacks of a hypocrisy that I cannot compartmentalise from how I feel about the rest of the book.


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on iTunes, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Wednesday, 22 September 2021

BITE-SIZED REVIEW: Under Siege 2 - Dark Territory

 Casey Ryback shambles back into action when terrorists overtake the train he is riding on with his niece (Katherine Heigl).


Since we are still in lockdown, I went and checked out a couple of Die Hard rip-offs. No matter how crummy they may be, there is something about action in a confined space that always works for me.  

I first watched Under Siege 2 about six years back and really enjoyed it. On this viewing I was able to nail it down to the one scene where it looks like Casey Ryback may actually die - he has fallen off the train and is clinging to the side of cliff. There are no obvious escape routes - he just has to hang on. It lasts about 20 seconds but it is a testament to how low the stakes are in this movie that this scene stood out.

In all his films, Seagal is invulnerable. This might have been softened if we got to watch him dispatch bad guys with his aikido skills - but aikido is so understated it never reads onscreen unless Seagal is shoving people into things. 

By the time he starred in this movie, Seagal could barely be bothered to do his one party trick  

It is rare that I feel for the people making a movie. Here it feels like the people behind the camera having fun making a schlocky but propulsive action movie - except for the scenes with the star. Every scene with Seagal feels like it is made by a completely different crew.

All his action scenes are either long shots of his stunt man running/jumping around the train, or  scenes pasted together of close ups and jump cuts. You can feel the filmmakers straining to bring energy to the movie, and every time it feels like it is building steam, we cut to Seagal and the movie comes to halt. 

Watching Seagal's fake intense face for so long, I could not help but be reminded of Will Sasso's impression on Mad TV. It was the only levity in the movie. 

Of the cast, Eric Bogosian is the highlight as the megalomaniacal villain. He seems to know he is in a pile of crap, and spits out every line like he's the guest villain in children's panto.

Everything in this movie seems designed to avoid having its star have to do anything.

Apparently Seagal was running the show behind the scenes, re-writing scenes and turning up irregularly. One blessing of the movie is because of his laziness, Seagal is barely in the movie. 

According to numerous stories, he was also using his power to terrorise actresses auditioning for roles on the film. Even without that knowledge, this movie reeks of sleaze - scientists test out the film's chief threat, a satellite that can cause earthquakes, by inspecting unsuspecting nude sunbather with its camera; Ryback disrobes a female  passenger to distract a terrorist. Frankly, more unsettling than these scenes are the resigned expressions on the faces of every actress who has to share a scene with Seagal. Ugh.

Under Siege 2 - Dark Territory is a crappy movie, but the best thing about it as that its relative failure hastened Seagal's fall from the relative big time.

If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on iTunes, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Sunday, 12 September 2021

BITE-SIZED REVIEW: The Eiger Sanction (Clint Eastwood, 1975)

 Retired assassin and mountain climber Jonathan Hemlock (Clint Eastwood) is blackmailed into completing a final assignment - the only twist is that while the identity of his target is unknown, his employers know that this individual will be one of the members of a climbing party attempting a summit of the deadly Eiger mountain.

The Eiger Sanction sounds great on the surface - a thriller set on the side of a mountain starring Dirty Harry? Sign me up!

Watching The Eiger Sanction is frustrating. From the beginning, the filmmaking is obviously sloppy. Eastwood uses handheld camera for static pans and tilts, which come off awkward and somewhat rushed. The editing is reminiscent of Vorkapitch in that it expects the viewer to put together what is going on in the scene from ellipsis and juxtaposition. Unlike Vorkapitch, there is no deeper point here. It feels like the scenes that received the least care and attention were the non-climbing sequences.

The story is also unnecessarily complicated with multiple twists and extrapolations that drag out the story. And when the story finally reaches the mountain, we get another reveal that makes the final climb feel completely pointless. 

Eastwood apparently thought the script was bad but believed the climbing sequences would save the movie. While they are well-photographed - and benefit from the star's willingness to do some of his own climbing - the story completely betrays these scenes.

George Kennedy, as Eastwood's friend and climbing buddy, brings a welcome dose of energy and personality. But this is a small consolation.

The Eiger Sanction could have been a nail-biter. Instead it is a sleep-cure.  

If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour.

You can subscribe on iTunes, or wherever you get your podcasts. 

Saturday, 11 September 2021

What I am looking forward to in NO TIME TO DIE

 

After nearly six years, No Time To Die is almost here (and by here, I mean markets like the UK and the US - people like myself in New Zealand and Australia will have to wait a while longer). That means the time for speculation is almost over (until Bond 26).


So here is a rundown of the elements of the film that I am excited about.

  1. A new 00 - the brief of Craig's Bond is to try new things. It is an idea that the filmmakers have adhered to with varying levels of success, but No Time To Die boasts a great concept in the appearance of Bond's replacement. The potential of this dynamic is fascinating. Previous Bonds have aged in the role, but this is the first time that the character is directly forced to deal with his obsolescence.

The first two trailers sold Lashana Lynch as intriguing - she gets the best lines, and she has a level of ease and physical skill - she is a callback to the action women of the Brosnan years. 

I hope they give her more script-wise. A lot of the action women were let down in that regard.

  1. The return of Madeleine Swann. This feels like it could be the movie’s secret weapon or ultimate weakness. 

Before she was cast in Spectre, I always thought Lea Seydoux would be a great addition for Bond. There is a fragility and darkness in her work that I always found fascinating - and she had some form in the genre, playing a Bond-like femme fatale in Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol. So when she was cast in Spectre, I was more excited at what her casting meant for the movie. Oops. 

The fact that they have brought her back was interesting, and the vague references to betrayal in the marketing only made me more interested in No Time To Die.

On top of that, I am a sucker for a comeback story, and I am hopeful that No Time To Die can give Seydoux a worthy showcase.

  1. Bond’s end. I have tried to keep my mind blank, but I cannot help thinking that Craig’s finale is going to be a little more… definitive than his predecessors.

That is about it. Those are the things I am looking forward to with No Time To Die. I am hopeful that the plot is not too complicated, and the movie spends more time with its characters and their relationships. I hope the action is OTT but with the visceral edge of Craig’s previous outings. And I hope Hans Zimmer-Steve Mazzaro’s score sends Craig out on a high note.


On that terrible pun, I will leave you.


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour.


You can subscribe on iTunes, or wherever you get your podcasts.