Saturday, 29 August 2026

OUT NOW: Teenage Sex and Death at Camp Miasma (Jane Schoenbrun, 2026)

Kris (Hannah Einbinder) is an upcoming filmmaker who has been hired to reboot the long-running Camp Miasma slasher franchise.


While she is suspicious that she has been hired because she is a queer filmmaker, Kris takes the gig. She has her own motive for taking the job: an opportunity to meet the franchise’s original final girl, Billy Presley (Gillian Anderson).


Visiting Billy at her home, which just so happens to be the site of the original film, Kris finds herself delving into her love of the franchise, and how it connects to her own sense of self.



Sometimes a film needs time to marinate to fully understand its meaning. And sometimes it takes time for you to realise the film’s meaning was never hidden, but exactly what you think it is.


When a movie goes fully into fantasy or blurs the lines, I tend to need a little grounding.


What I liked about this is that the emotional through line becomes that anchor - Chris’s obsession with this franchise boils down to deeper issues with sex and intimacy.


I loved the in-film history of Camp Miasma, with the early film posters inspired by Friday the 13th, followed by a DTV period, with high concept sequels (I want to know more about Miasma 3000!), and that level of detail helps to immerse the viewer in Chris’s state of mind.


The film connects our obsession with pop culture to our loss of connection with other people.


It also tackles the attraction to onscreen sex and death (the underlying impulses behind horror movies, James Bond and a host of other long-running series) but without any sense of condemnation. It takes the image of a woman running semi-nude while being chased by the killer and turns it into a moment of euphoria.


The film accomplishes this by making this dichotomy the vehicle for Chris’s own fear of intimacy and her own desires.


Despite her age, she is living an adult life completely disconnected from herself. This reboot project is almost a gateway back to her adolescence, and back to her own desires.


Chris has a partner (Scream star Jasmin Savoy Brown) and is part of a polygamous relationship, although that status appears to be something her partner is more into than she is (or something she herself endorses as a way to avoid intimacy).


Billy Presley, the star of the original slasher, becomes her guide through this process.


The film makes it clear she is not a famous person - she is barely a cult figure. The film makes it clear she is part of Chris’s singular fixation on the original film - in particular, a shot of Billy’s eye during the in-film movie’s sex scene.


The riddle of the actor’s feelings in this shot recurs throughout the film, as Chris is forced to delve into her own conflicted feelings about her body and pleasure


As the film begins to blur the line between what is real and reel, and Chris begins to act on her attraction to Billy, the film turns into a strangely poignant coming of age story. 


Sexy, deadpan and loving of its genre without descending into pedantry, Teenage Sex and Death at Camp Miasma is a gem.


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!

BITE-SIZED: The Wild Robot (Chris Sanders, 2024)

After being accidentally released on a remote island, service robot Roz (Lupita Nyong’o) finds a new purpose as the guardian of a runt gosling, Brightbill (Kit Connor), whose parent she accidentally killed.


As Brightbill grows up, and Roz grows beyond her assigned role, the robot has to contend with the fact she will have to let him go, so he can survive amongst his own kind.


And then her corporation re-enters the picture…



I do not generally watch movies aimed at kids, but I am always trying to expand the focus of this blog.


Written and directed by Chris Sanders, whose credits include Lilo & Stitch and How to Train Your Dragon, this is a lovely movie.


I love how vibrant the aesthetic is - apparently it was inspired by the colour palette of classic Disney. Meanwhile, Roz the robot’s rubbery physics approximate the looser movements of classic Warner animation, creating an aesthetic clash that works for Roz’s outsider status on the island.


The film’s focus on the robot’s body verges on body horror at points - the scene of the raccoons stealing her internal components - but it all feels closer to the anarchic spirit of Looney Tunes rather than Cronenberg.


The idea of a robot raising a wild animal is the hook, but what is impressive about The Wild Robot is how it uses this as a starting point for exploring notions of the struggle between programming and free will, parenthood, growing up, and overcoming differences.


When Brightbill finally takes off with the flock, and there were 40 mins left I was wondering what would happen next. The plot gets a little busy but the characters are so well-drawn, particularly Rozz and Brightbill, I could overlook this.


The finale is a little too neat, considering the maturity of the film’s themes, but The Wild Robot remains a delight. 


Related:


Nimona


The Sea Beast


Friday, 21 August 2026

OUT NOW: Mutiny (Jean-Francois Richet, 2026)

After his boss and mentor is murdered, driver Cole (Jason Statham) follows the killers' trail to a container ship engaged in human trafficking.

As Cole and crew member Angie (Annabelle Wallis) attempt to rescue the ship's prisoners, they have to evade capture by the ship's ruthless crew and find some way to signal for help.


I was not the biggest fan of The Beekeeper, but I was excited that Jason Statham was back doing the kinds of films he is best at.


Mutiny might not rank as one of his best efforts, but it is kind of great. It is the kind of solid, unpretentious action programmer we do not get any more.


Directed by Jean-Francois Richet (Assault on Precinct 13, Bloodfather, Plane), Mutiny was initially intended as the follow-up to 2023's Plane, as either a spinoff for Mike Colter, or a sequel starring Butler. For whatever reason, those versions did not come to pass, and the project was re-conceived around Statham.


All to the good. 


The movie's set up is a little sweaty - it starts out as a man-on-the-run thriller, with Statham's Cole stowing away onboard the ship, before he stumbles on its cargo.


Once the pieces are in place, the film turns into a pleasingly violent riff on Die Hard, with our heroes clambering through the ship's maze of corridors and containers.


What sticks out about the film is how lo-fi it is. The ship is not exceptional - it boasts no secret rooms, or enhanced security systems. The filmmakers spend the runtime aboard the ship emphasising how much of an obstacle it is on its own terms. 


That focus on the central environment gives Mutiny a welcome sense of verisimilitude. Having Statham have to contend with a tactile environment, where danger can lurk around every corner, also gives the character a greater sense of vulnerability.


It also helps that his adversary, mercenary ship captain Captain Marko Madsen (Roland Møller), is not some placeholder. His final showdown with Statham is more of a dramatic back and forth (he knifes Statham and throws him off the boat). In another example of how the film makes use of the environment, with most of their fight taking place on a loose gangway swinging around off the side of the ship. 


The captain's grisly demise is the capper on a delightful series of gruesome ends - there is an inventiveness to the violence that feels out of a slasher movie (if you have ever pondered the lethality of a padlock, this movie has you covered).


Mutiny is at its best at sea. When the film heads back to land for the final wrap-up, it loses some of its special magic.


Still, this is a minor issue. Check it out.


Related:


Wildcard


Furious 7


Fate of the Furious


Operation Fortune


The Meg 2 - The Trench


The Beekeeper


A Working Man


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!

Wednesday, 19 August 2026

Prosecution (Faraz Shariat, 2026)

A talented new prosecutor (Chen Emilie Yan) finds her trust in the system challenged when she becomes the victim of a hate crime.

As she reckons with the limits of the law, she realises she will have to go outside those limits in order to bring her attacker to justice.


I really struggled with the plot outline for this movie - not because of its complications, but because in summarising it, the premise can sound like a vigilante thriller.


It is, of a kind.


Instead of using a gun, Seyo uses every trick she can think of to turn the law into her weapon. 


It is a tired sentiment to say a film is ‘for our times’, but Prosecution is an especially resonant and urgent example.


With the rise of AdF in Germany as an electoral force, 


What makes it more effective is how unvarnished it is in exploring how white supremacy is upheld. 


We are introduced to Seyo prosecuting a case that lets a neo-Nazi off the hook. After the case we see in her car, trying to decompress. She is self-aware, but she is not willing - until she is targeted - to offer any challenge to the system.


The film draws on the nuances of racism and privilege that are not specific to the German context - multiple characters, including a black woman who is a first generation immigrant who has had to endure repeated attacks from the far right, point out her hypocrisy in contrast with how use approached other hate crimes before the one directed at herself.


One of the ironies of the film is that Kim’s quest is echoed by ultra-right wingers who are trying to subvert the institutions from the inside.


Subvert might be too strong - they appear to be using its inherent nod and attempts toward neutrality to capture it. 


And the film milks most of its obstacles and tension from this underlying conflict - it always feels like Seyo is running late in a race that has already started. The far right has the advantage, and they have no compunction about showing themselves - in one horrifying sequence, Seyo is arrested by police officers who then subject her to a pointless detention.

 

Scenes like this highlight one of the key conflicts of the film: the contradiction of Seyo’s quest - she is both seeking to uphold an institution while also fighting against it to do what is right. 


One of the film’s strengths is how it escalates the tension without conventional setpieces. 


There are a few deliberate jolts purely from transitions, jolting the viewer deeper into the character’s headspace and escalating danger (one of the biggest jumps is a cut to our heroine at a target range).


It also makes sly use of screen space - the film builds such an atmosphere of claustrophobia and paranoia that there are scenes where I was expecting something to happen.


One of the most unexpectedly suspenseful moments in the film is during a late scene where Seyo takes down the wall-length mind map she has pasted across her floor-to -ceiling window.


The filmmakers have done such a good job of grounding us in this context, and Seyo’s paranoia, that danger appears to be omnipresent.


In the lead role, Chen Emilie Yan is the quietly intense but human centre of this pressure cooker of a movie. 


Seyo is a fascinating character, defined by her intelligence and un-relenting drive.


When she is attacked, Seyo immediately goes into action - calling in the police and ordering forensics. She even puts on a body suit so she does not contaminate the crime scene. 


Seyo does not want to dwell or reflect - she wants to get to the bottom of the situation. 


Every time Seyo faces an obstacle, she does not stop - she just changes tactics. Seyo’s power move is not violence, but the law - exemplified when she lines up German law books in prep for her disciplinary hearing. 


On paper, there is a danger Seyo could have become a cipher, or come across as a legal Terminator. Yan gives Seyo a vulnerability, a simmering sense of the fear and trauma that she is still dealing with. Her work is her way of processing this pain. 


Yan also gives Seyo an underlying sense of outrage - how could this have happened to her, a state prosecutor? That subtext is an important part of the film’s underlying message about the insidiousness of white supremacy, and prevents the movie from turning into something more reductive and easily resolved. 


The film seems to recognise its proximity to a more generic version of the story - and it plays with imagery associated with vigilante or superhero stories.


Seyo gets a reinforced black car, she gets a firearm licence when railing the neo-Nazis, and when she spies on her opposition, she wears dark clothes and a mask.


IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN THE FILM, I WOULD ADVISE NOT READING FURTHER.


One expects this to lead to some kind of violent catharsis but it does not.


Seyo’s tenacity and intelligence win out, but her victory is not framed as total - the sheer effort Seyo has to put into defeating the neo-Nazis, compared with the relative ease of her enemies, seems fairly pointed.


And while the film ends with most of the neo-Nazis free, the final scene offers some sense of how the tables have begun to turn.


We end on a montage, intercutting between the neo-Nazis at home, each reacting to the sound of a car engine revving outside. The sequence climaxes with the man (Lasse Klene) who knocked Seyo off her bike, setting the story in motion.


Seyo slowly cruises past him, just slow enough so that he - and the viewer - can register her dead-eyed unblinking stare. She may not have put them in prison, but she has made her fear theirs - now they will fear the world outside.  


She ends the film unbowed - and unleashed.


I left the film wondering if Seyo would get her own series of adventures, using and breaking the law to protect the innocent from neo-Nazis.


It probably would not happen, but the character, and the film around her, are so strong I would not mind returning to her onto another case.


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!

Tuesday, 18 August 2026

OUT NOW: The Odyssey (Christopher Nolan, 2026)

Following the end of the Trojan War, Odysseus (Matt Damon) heads home.


Tormented by his experiences, Odysseus is determined to bring his men home.


While he is away, his wife Penelope (Anne Hathaway) attempts to ward off a mob of suitors thirsting for Odysseus’s crown. 



The Odyssey took a while to write. On the one hand, my feelings coming out of the screening were pretty solid. But then I started reading other people’s takes, and started doubting my basic takeaways.


This does not always happen, but I do find there is at least one to two films a year that get seized on by the zeitgeist, and I find myself approaching my own writing in a kind of defensive crouch, as though I am afraid of sharing my own opinion. 


In this case, I am a bit agnostic on Christopher Nolan’s movies. I would not say they  have never resonated with me, but I am not rushing out to see every movie (as of this writing I still have not seen Oppenheimer).


I can appreciate some more than others, and I always enjoy watching them on the big screen, but I never go back to them.


After catching Tenet last year, I thought the dam might have broken - I could not follow the intricacies of time travel, but there was something about its scope, messiness and the nihilism of the villain that I got into.


I was trying to think about why I do not like his films that much and it came down to a couple of things: one was Angelica Jade Bastien talking about how limited the female roles are in Nolan’s work.


It made me think about how I sometimes find his characters to feel more functional - not that this is necessarily a bad thing (he casts well) but there are times and films where the character is clearly defined, but in a way that I personally find so clearly defined it can come across as bland. 


Sometimes this does not matter - I think DiCaprio’s character in Inception is not that interesting on his own, but as a piece of the film, it is irrelevant.


I also caught a comment from another critic I enjoy, Jourdain Searles, who ripped the bandaid off and pointed out how ridiculously straightforward Nolan’s thematic concerns are e.g. war is bad. 


This comment, and a second viewing, finally uncorked it for me.


Basically, it is not that deep. I think Nolan is talented, and has a singular vision. But it is not one I want to bury myself in.


The Odyssey feels a bit more my speed.


There is something about how it reckons with the effects of war that resonated - it is fairly straightforward and emotive idea.


The Trojan War, specifically his role in ending it, infects every aspect of Odysseus’s return home.


Even before this moment, the film is occupied with the fallout of the war: Aggememnon murdered, Helen scarred and imprisoned in her own home, and Odysseus’s own trauma, reflected in his visions of Athena (Zendaya) - the only deity we see, for reasons that become clear. 


The film is at its strongest when delivering Odysseus’s final epiphany - his final reconciliation of his actions, and what he must do in restitution.


The set pieces - especially the Cyclops, the giant Laestrygonians - are effective, but I left impressed with the impact of the war, almost more so than the setpieces, and that is important.


Not that I did not enjoy the movie up to that point, but Odysseus is taken with concepts of honour; his gambit with the Trojan Horse violates this code, as well as defying Athena, in whose name it was supposedly in.


The cumulative weight of the Trojan War overshadows the momentary peril of Odysseus’s other adventures: on the re-watch, each of them feel like divine punishments, not just from the gods, but the world. 


The constant paranoia about the people from the sea is really a stand-in. There is an overriding feeling of decline - war has sucked the life out of the Greeks. It was Agamemnon’s venture across the sea which destroyed this civilisation, and Odysseus is doomed for supporting it.


Damon is a welcome central presence, bringing weight, intelligence and frailty.


He is also believable as someone just egotistical enough to screw up (when he shoots the Cyclops). Odysseus’s more headstrong qualities - his desire to save his men, and wrest control of fate away from the gods - come across as earnest expressions of self-belief.


While I was impressed by the visual effects, I am so jaded I was not fully sure of when something was a physical or optical effect.


Scylla was the one disappointment - it appears to be computer-generated, but my major issue is how it (she?) looked. Nolan does not really go for theatricality, but I was underwhelmed by the design - while a camouflaged entity that disguises itself as rocks could be interesting, it comes off as mundane. This is a minor complaint. 


Of the various antagonists, it is Circe’s sequence that stands out.


It is ironic for a movie that has been sold on its spectacle and sense of scale that its most effective set-piece comes down to one actor in one familiar environment.


Morton’s performance is so singular she stands out, even after the cyclops and the giant Laestrygonians. She brings the residue of a history of past pain inflicted by men. In a way, she reflects the trauma of the root of evil that is bringing down this world. 


Most of the other women in this film are spouting exposition (Lupita Nyongo’s Helen) or pushing Odysseus on (Charlize Theron’s Calypso). Their casting works for the movie in terms of presence, but they are the equivalent of non-playable characters in a video game.


By contrast, Samantha Morton is an island into herself. Hers is a knowing performance, filled with weariness and muffled disdain for the repetition of human cruelty.


She was one of the highlights of my first screening, but she really stuck out on my re-viewing.


Another highlight is Melenus - brother of Agamemnon (Benny Safdie) and husband of Helen. Jon Bernthal is so well-cast, bringing an earthy swagger and humor that the film frankly needs. 


While he seems content, there is a void around him. He is the one who got home with everything (his wife and life) he wanted, but he is now hollowed out. 


Safdie’s Agamemnon is barely seen, an almost Vader-like silhouette. The only time he gets a close up is when he is killed - the moment his power is broken.


Page gets a brief but meaty role as Sinon. Usually presented as a traitor in other tellings of the Trojan War, here he is a victim - a poor soldier who only realises how manipulated he is when he is dead.


Robert Pattinson is also fantastic as the slippery suitor Antinous - willing to do whatever it takes for the throne, but not willing to get his own hands dirty.


With Nolan’s work, I always have to account for personal taste. With these kinds of films, I do miss a certain level of theatricality. Based on my vague familiarity with the source, I was expecting more sensuality, although thematically it would not make sense - this is a world sapped of life. 


While it is dour, the movie has some good moments of humour - Corey Hawkins gets a legitimate sight gag, and Elliot Page gets the funniest line in the picture (“Feel free to add some stuff”). 


Overall, an enjoyable watch. While the film is fairly straightforward, I wonder how its success - coming amidst both the industry’s struggles and the US’s seemingly inevitable collapse following its pointless war in Iran - will be viewed in retrospect. 


Related


Tenet


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!