Saturday, 26 April 2025

Child’s Play (Tom Holland, 1988)

Anxious to give her son Andy (Alex Vincent) a Good Guy doll for his birthday, Karen (Catherine Hicks) buys a doll from a street vendor.

As soon as the doll is in her home, tragedy strikes: her best friend is killed and Andy is the chief culprit.

After all, he was the only other person in the apartment...


I never watched these movies as a kid, but I have vivid memories of Child’s Play 1-3 VHS covers in rental stores as a kid.


I only watched this movie about 15 years ago, and that was because I enjoyed Tom Holland’s Fright Night.


I have not seen any of the sequels until now.


Maybe it is because of how fantastical the later movies get, or being raised by a single parent, but what stuck out about the original film is the way it grounds you in the POV of this family unit.

 

Andy’s introductory scene is so good at just making him a kid, particularly in the way the camera stays on the child’s messy efforts to make his mother breakfast: burning the toast, spilling the juice, flooding the cereal bowl.


One of the tensest scenes in the movie is the brief sequence of Andy carrying the tray into his mother’s room, intercutting the food going everywhere with his small feet tripping over each other.


These scenes give a sense of realism but also a sense of stakes. This is just an ordinary kid with an ordinary mother.


The film does not spend a lot of time going over the family’s backstory, and it does not need to.


The focus on the economics of being a single mother - having to stay at work; the kid who has to learn how to take public transport around the city - even before Chucky shows up, there is a precariousness to the family that raises the stakes.


It also feels like the film lifting a middle finger to the family values of the eighties, and horror thrillers of this kind. Not just slasher movies, but more straightforward thrillers like Fatal Attraction or The Hand That Rocks The Cradle


There are so many variations of this horror scenario where the victims would be a conventional nuclear family. Instead it is a single woman and her son struggling to find anyone who will believe or help them.


As the film’s anchor, Andy’s mother Karen, Catherine Hicks is fantastic. It is a tough role - playing a mother torn over whether to believe her son is a murderer - and she plays it without mannerism or overwrought emotion. 


What helped sell her relationship with Andy is the sense of strain, the occasional moments when she cannot keep the mask up and snaps at him. She feels real. It is too bad her character was not brought back. 


Chris Sarandon is well cast as the cop - he is invested in the case but he is not presented as a hero. He’s an asshole who does not believe Karen until he is almost killed - and when he does help, he never tells them what caused his change of heart (not that we need the exposition, but it feels character-based; he is too proud to admit he is wrong).


And finally Brad Dourif. While we get a few moments of the real man at the start, this performance is all about the voice. What a voice - the way he can go from trembling falsetto to a low bellow - it is almost like he is naturally caught between adolescence and adulthood.


The tension between the adult and the child, innocence and knowledge, a single parent playing mother and father - there is a duality to Child’s Play that would continue to play out through the sequels, as writer Don Mancini would continue to mine the story of Chucky and his growing brood.


But we shall leave that to another review…


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!

High Sierra (Raoul Walsh, 1941)

Fresh from prison, Roy Earle (Humphrey Bogart) has been hired to run a robbery.

Time has past but Roy hasn’t.

Will he find his feet?

Or will his old ways lead to his doom?


“He said you were rushing towards death”


This blog has been missing some Bogart.


So I went back, back to the role which made Bogart a name, and set him on a course for superstardom: 1941's High Sierra.


Bogart had been working for years, and had some notice for 1936’s The Petrified Forest, but he toiled in b-pictures and supporting roles for the next couple of years. 


Weathered, world-weary, a tough exterior hiding an empathetic soul, High Sierra’s Earle feels like a vintage Bogart part - since it is the start of his rise, it also carries an energy and a sense of newness.


Introduced as a pardoned convict, Earle is a man who is used to being in control, but is now in a position where he controls nothing. The character’s conundrum almost plays like a meta-textual narrative for the fledgling star - older than his compatriots, yet still hungering for a shot at the big time.


Earle’s increasing anxiety over his reduced status feels like an extension of the performer, as the actor finds his way into the persona that would define his stardom.


The film also plays as an eulogy for the gangster film. Earle is a man out of time, and the old world he represents - like his old boss Mac (Donald MacBride) - is dying.


Earle has gone from being the violent young man, to an angry old one. 


At the end of the movie, Earle goes back to his old ways and tries to go on the run.


But once again, Earle is not with the times: We get a montage showing the police using radios and maps to track him.


Certain elements are out of time in other ways: Algernon (Willie Best) is a cliched black servant - constantly sleeping on the job, he also has a comical reaction where he goes cross-eyed. It is a trope Jordan Peele recalled in a Key & Peele sketch about black roles in old studio movies.


An important movie, but not one I can see myself going back to.


It is a tad slow, and the focus on Earle’s relationship with a disabled girl is so saccharine it feels like the studio is trying to overcompensate for the character’s brutality.


The subplot feels more extraneous when the film already has Earle matched with Ida Lupino’s Marie, a tough gunmole who is introduced playing gangsters off against each other, and the one person who brings out the old gangster’s humanity.


Related 







If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!

Q the Winged Serpent (Larry Cohen, 1982)

Tasked with solving a series of bizarre murders, two police detectives (David Carridine and Richard Roundtree) found themselves on the trail of small-time crook Joseph Quinn (Michael Moriarity).


Quinn is happy to help the officers find their culprit - if the city is willing to pay him for it…



One of the best cheapie genre pictures, Q the Winged Serpent is a testament to creativity and sheer guts.


Technically it is a bit rough, but it adds to the movie, lending it a run-and-gun, guerrilla-style sense of realism.


In its extended, improvised scenes, it plays like a slightly fantastical cousin to John Cassavetes’ Gloria.


Michael Moriarty’s performance as Quinn, the ex-con /failed criminal who holds the city to ransom, is magnetic.

 

Quinn is a lifelong loser, and Moriarity, with his endless monologuing and constant grasp-ing for status, never seems to lose sight of that. He is not exactly sympathetic, but you cannot stop watching him. 

  

It is hard to tell where truth ends and bullshit begins, but the fates of everyone on his chip-burdened shoulders. 


There is a scene toward the middle of the film where Moriarity is on fire:

 

Finally given power and status, Quinn forces the city authorities to deal with him. Confronting police brutality, showing up the hypocrisy and horse-trading of politics, Quinn is the flop-sweating hero the city needs.


The stop-motion effects are a little shaky but they are still impressive in how they are spliced into the few attack sequences.


The chief reason the film works is because of the focus on character - the monster is just a catalyst.


Conjured up after Larry Cohen was kicked off the big-budget remake of Mickey Spillane’s I, The Jury, Q the Winged Serpent is a bit shaggy (every time I watch I completely forget about the subplot involving the murderous, Q-worshipping cult), but it has such a sense of forward momentum you cannot help buit get swept up in it (you cannot say the same for I, The Jury).


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!

Friday, 25 April 2025

Gloria (John Cassavetes, 1980)

When her neighbours are murdered by the mob, veteran gunmole Gloria (Gena Rowland) finds herself the reluctant custodian of their young son (John Adames).


I have never seen a John Cassavetes movie. I am aware of his work, but I always put it off. 

Gloria always sounded the most appealing due to the genre hook. I was hoping this could serve as a bridge into the rest of the auteur’s work.

And I think it worked.

While the genre element is compelling, Gloria has so much to recommend it.

For one, it is a great New York movie. Shot on the streets and subways, the film gains a unique vitality and dynamism.

Rowlands is pure dynamite. Brusque, tough, clumsily trying to build a rapport with an innocent.

Abrasive and unaffected, child performer John Adames works as another layer of verisimilitude to the movie. Rowlands and Adames have a rapport that feels completely in the moment, leaning into the clash of age, experience and the sheer suddenness of their forced bond

There are moments which feel found. Rather than presenting her charge as a pure object to be protect, the film just treats Phil as a kid - burdened with the sudden loss of his family, and stuck beside a stranger. He does not fall in line with Gloria - he actively rebels, and tries to run away.

The movie never stops moving - it is so good at building suspense, and most of that tension comes from the uneasy relationship between the veteran gun mole and her unwilling companion.

While the film is trying to avoid resembling a traditional thriller, Gloria's scrappy, hand-held, character-based narrative has a purity and sense of focus that most thrillers can only dream of - while it is built on characterisation, Gloria is also movie about character - how does life experience, how do events and new relationships affect it? What is revealed about a person when the chips are down? What are you willing to sacrifice? What are you willing to fight for?

This tension is not just the basis of thrillers but all drama. And that is why, despite its lack of gloss and set-pieces, Gloria is a great thriller.

If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!