Tuesday, 29 July 2025

BITE-SIZED: Megan 2.0 (Gerard Johnstone, 2025)

When a new model based on Megan’s design goes rogue, Megan is resurrected in an upgraded form to face off against the new threat.




There is a danger when a sequel appears to be informed by the online hype surrounding the first film - I caught the trailer in the theatre, and I was worried the movie would just be fan service.


I liked the first Megan. It didn’t stick to my ribs but it was fun.


Turning a horror feature into a sci-fi action franchise can work (see Terminator 2), but sadly this sequel follows the law of diminishing returns.


This movie goes for scope and setpieces, in the process losing the intimacy and characterisation of its predecessor. 


 The title character gets more quips and an anime-style makeover, but the attempt at a heroic arc is undermined by the desire to maintain her established personality.


Overall, it just lacks any kind of unifying magic or originality.


Related


Megan


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour


You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!


OUT NOW: Deep Cover (Tom Kingsley, 2025)

Three struggling improvisers (Bryce Dallas Howard, Orlando Bloom, Nick Mohammed) are hired by the police to infiltrate a gang on a drug buy.


It’s meant to be simple, but the trio find their improv skills only cause the situation to escalate.



Where have theatrical comedies gone?


Deep Cover was not on my radar - my brother brought it up and I thought he meant the Laurence Fishbourne movie. 


I went in with no expectations - the cast was not appealing and Colin Trevorrow's name in the credits did not help.


I do not think I have laughed this hard since Game Night.


I love comedy thrillers, but they are so few and far between.


They sound so easy - the bones of both genres are the same. 


It is hard to maintain stakes and laughs at the same time - one wrong move and it can come off too grim or too lightweight.


The cast is great.


Orlando Bloom is exceptionally wellcast - playing an actor who is struggling against his image as an empty dreamboat.


He is playing a character grasping for depth and gravitas - his inability to plumb the depths of the human soul is woefully, excruciatingly displayed. The way he keeps grabbing bits of business from the people around him (down to stealing Sean Bean’s accent) is a joke that just builds on itself.


Leaving him to his own devices is like leaving a child with a loaded gun. 


The film blends the tension to the escalation of the joke.


Another running bit is Hugh’s (Nick Mohammed) fumbling attraction to the villain’s henchwoman Shosh (Sonoya Mizuno).


Attraction between hero and villain is a trope I have often thought of with action movies, and here is a character who actually jumps at it.


This becomes another lit fuse when she becomes attracted to him, mistaking his bumbling exterior for the banality of evil.


A terrific film.


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour


You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!

OUT NOW: Heads of State (Ilya Naishuller, 2025)

Following a failed assassination attempt, the US President (John Cena) and the British Prime Minister (Idris Elba) are forced to race for their lives through Eastern Europe.



A movie clearly built on someone watching The Suicide Squad and thinking more of this minus the giant starfish, Heads of State is a passable action comedy elevated by a strong cast.


What it indicates is that screenwriters have figured out how to write for John Cena.


While he has shown dramatic chops, particularly in Peacemaker, Cena is still defined by how he looks: a parody of machismo.


Casting him requires finesse.


That giant chin is just a shade big.


His mouth too wide.


By sheer luck of birth (and some other scientific means), he looks like a human cartoon.


He also has an understanding of how he plays on camera, and a willingness to poke fun at himself. 


Maybe this comes from wrestling, but he seems to have an openness to trying things, rather than protect a brand.


I know the Rock has been trying to do a remake of Big Trouble in Little China for years but it is Cena who would fit the tone of that film.

 

He is a major asset here.


The idea of a celebrity, unqualified president is not novel anymore, but Cena infuses the character with an earnest belief in and understanding of the importance of public performance.


Idris Elba is an effective straight man, giving Cena’s earnest idiot someone to ground him. Priyanka Chopra makes a solid case as an action protagonist. Without this trio, this movie would be a snooze.


The action is solid but the interplay between the leads is what keeps the movie alive.


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour


You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!


Monday, 28 July 2025

The Wrecking Crew (Denny Tedesco, 2008)


I am a big fan of Glen Campbell -- he's the only country guy who gets my vote. I cannot explain why, but his music resonates with me in a way that others of his ilk do not. A couple of years ago I had the pleasure of seeing his last Auckland concert. Now what is often forgotten about Campbell is what talented guitarist he is -- at the Auckland show, he played a high speed version of Flight of the Bumble Bee with the guitar over his head.


Before he became a big star, Campbell was a session guitarist who worked as part of an elite group of session players known as the 'Wrecking Crew'. They worked with everyone from Frank Sinatra to the Beach Boys (Glen Campbell played on 'Good Vibrations' and stepped in for Brian Wilson following his breakdown). After decades in the shadows, this documentary (available in the US since 2008) brings the 'Crew's' story to light.  

As a trove of information, The Wrecking Crew is worth a look. I had some knowledge of the Wrecking Crew from Kent Hartman’s 2012 book, but there is an added impact to watching the musicians do live performance back to familiar tunes.


As a documentary, it is a little too scattered. Tedesco’s scope is a little too wide - as the son of one of the musicians (guitarist Tommy Tedesco), he tries to use his father’s story as a spine.


That narrative line is a little threadbare - Tedesco will sporadically provide voice-over which felt out of place.


There is also no narrative structure to the various sections of the documentary - we get occasional profiles of the musicians, but then we get another section which shall be on the wall of sound or Brian Wilson’s recordings with the group. It just comes off a little disorganised, and I left the film feeling like it needed more focus and depth. It almost would work better if it had provided more of a chronology or a focus on his dad’s story.

  

It probably works best as a taster for the Crew’s work. 


If you want the Wrecking Crew’s story, I would recommend reading Kent Hartman’s book instead, and maybe using the documentary as an audiovisual side dish. 


Post-script


I wrote the opening paragraphs to this review on 28th July 2015.


I was planning to go to a screening of The Wrecking Crew at that year’s New Zealand film festival.


The screening was late and I think I had just finished another screening earlier that afternoon. I l was too tired and decided to just go home.


I left these opening lines, thinking I would get around to watching the documentary at another date.


I did not think it would be a decade. 


So much has changed. 


Personally, I am in a completely different place. In 2015 I had re-booted this blog as part of a broader career re-think.


After bombing out of law school, I spent 2015 as a freelance writer, pitching articles to Den of Geek and reviewing Auckland theatre for Theatrescenes.


It was a really exciting time, and I had the time to try a variety of different things.


Within six months of this aborted review, I would be using my freelance work to apply to journalism school.


2015 was an important turning point for me. 


It was also sadly significant in a different way - it was the same year Donald Trump announced he was running for president, and it was the beginning of the end of the post-World War Two order. 


While I was disturbed by the accelerating climate crisis and widening inequality ten years ago, I still had some hope that things could get better.


Trump’s election in 2016 showed that optimism to be bullshit.


Incremental improvement would not save us. And now on top of collapsing ecosystems, we would have to face down the resurgence of global facism.


I was one of the people who was completely discombobulated by his election. I lost most of my interest in writing.


What was the point in writing about pop culture? And in that realm, what could I actually contribute?


I drifted for a long time. I went to work, I hung out with friends and family, and I kept writing - but the spark was gone.


I gradually lost interest in freelance work, and stopped pitching ideas. 


I had always been a writer, in some way. But now it just turned into an exercise. This blog became a bit of a life raft, a way to keep myself afloat.


It kept me going through Trump’s first term, the global pandemic, first love, and the horror of the Gaza genocide.


I do not know if I will ever get that spark I had when I wrote the first lines for this review a decade ago. But I will keep writing. 


I have to.




Friday, 25 July 2025

Rob Roy (Michael Caton-Jones, 1995)

Accused of a crime he did not commit, Robert McGregor (Liam Neeson) is forced to become a bandit.


As the authorities’ tactics become more savage, will the noble Scotsman’s fight for justice turn into a quest for vengeance?



Released the same year as Braveheart, Rob Roy was overshadowed. I was not even aware of it until decades later. Hilariously, it now has one thing over Mel Gibson’s movie - I still have never seen Braveheart.


Rob Roy is not a secret masterpiece - but it is an interesting film.


While it utilises the tropes of various genres (the swashbuckler, the western), it also wants to ground itself in the specific historical context of Robert McGregor’s life and times. There is a focus on the gritty minutiae of everyday life, from showing multiple people having bowel movements, the number of supporting characters  with terrible teeth, and the overall horrific treatment of women. 


This film wants to make clear how tough this time period was just to live in. But these elements are ultimately purely aesthetic.


The portrayal of the title character does not have that level of grounding: 


In contrast to everyone else in this world, he is a figure of virtue. He is a man of honour, who actually believes in the concept. 


It marks him out from everyone else, particularly the nobles who use the class system to their advantage, using subterfuge and lies to achieve their aims without losing face.


Neeson gives the role gravitas - it is hard to imagine anyone else conveying the same level of sincerity; there is no ironic twinkle to his performance, or the movie around him.


But there is nothing to the character - there is no sense of real conflict or contradiction to him.


The film attempts to inject a certain emotional realism via his relationship with his wife Mary (Jessica Lange). During the film, she is assaulted by the film’s villain, and chooses to stay silent and not tell her husband what had happened. This is not just an act of self-preservation, but a realisation that Rob would stop at nothing to avenge her, luring him out of hiding to certain doom. 


This movie is not so much revisionism as an act of myth-making - taking the story of a Celtic folk hero and creating a cinematic epic.


Rob Roy not having an arc is not necessarily a problem -  I was expecting him to be more of a character like Superman. He would act as an example for the people around him to rise up against the nobles.


This never happens. The character Alisdair seems to be intended as the film’s point of comparison: his pride keeps getting in the way of helping Rob and his people (he sleeps through the attack on Rob and Mary’s home; his desire to make up for his failure leads to Rob’s capture, and the death of his compatriots).


One narrative thread the film - bafflingly - ignores, is Rob’s campaign stealing from the Marquess of Montrose (John Hurt). We are shown Rob’s initial decision, and the Marquess briefly grumbles about it, but we never see it.


It might just be the movie trying to avoid turning into Robin Hood, but it removes a certain sense of scale from Rob’s story. 


THe central issue with the movie is that it feels like it has aspirations than acting as a straightforward genre piece. It has the shape of a western, but it does not want to give the same kind of catharsis.


The one aspect of the movie that is genuinely compelling is Tim Roth’s performance as foppish villain Archibald Cunningham. Portrayed as Rob’s opposite, he is the scion of a noblewoman who now works as a hatchet man for the Marquess (who, it is implied, may be his father).


An illegitimate child who does not know his father, he has allegiance to no one, and sees people as things to be used.


His dog-eat-dog worldview is the polar opposite of the noble McGregor, and gives the film its centre of conflict.


Roth plays him with a sense of self-loathing, and an acceptance of his own damnation (in one great scene,  he grins down the barrel of a loaded pistol).


In a movie that only tips its claymore toward revisionism, his character is the real deal.


Directed by Michael Caton-Jones, Rob Roy is handsomely mounted, but it is ultimately too in awe of its subject to deliver something truly rousing. 


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour


You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!