Sunday, 29 March 2026

Laura (Otto Preminger, 1944)

Following the murder of Laura Hunt (Gene Tierney), detective Mark McPherson (Dana Andrews) is put on the case to find her killer.


As he is drawn into her world, McPherson finds himself falling under the dead woman’s spell…



When I first started university, I read something which has stuck with me ever since. It is a line from David Henry Hwang’s M. Butterfly:


“Because only a man knows how a woman is supposed to act”


The idea of a woman as a construction, an idea, and the clash between the construct and a real person.


That conflict has fascinated me long before I read that line, but it unlocked that theme.


And I soon began to pick it out among movies I enjoyed: Vertigo, Mona Lisa and Ex Machina.


I have only seen Laura once before, almost two decades ago, but it was not as sticky as those other movies.


My re-appreciation for it started after I found a copy of Vera Caspary’s book in a used bookstore. Reading it reignited my interest in the story.


Another catalyst was Foster Hirsch’s biography on Otto Preminger, which provided an in-depth breakdown of the film’s production.

 

Watching it now, I do not know why I did not enjoy it on my first go-around.


Laura is such a beautiful encapsulation of the idea of the woman as an idea - not just an image, but a story. 


The film opens on Laura’s painting - the image which act as the foundation of, and cover for, the various imagined versions of her. 


As the camera pans around Waldo’s apartment, his voice introduces us to the story, and also offers the first characterisation of the title character. Unlike the other characters in the film, he references his own role in mythologising her.


The characters’ personal images of Laura are reflections of their own deepest needs and desires:


Laura is a reflection of Waldo’s command of taste, his knowledge of how to own and use beauty and femininity. 


For Dana Andrews’ McPherson, she is a mystery to be solved, a beauty who is perfect because she no longer exists - the perfect companion for a man who avoids intimacy.


Dana Andrews’ understated performance matches the film - a placid surface barely hiding the roiling fire underneath.


He is matched by Clifton Webb’s preening, barbed performance as Waldo Lydecker. Once again, his sophisticated front is a mask, hiding a deep well of jealousy and hate.


I do not have any real thoughts about Gene Tierney in the title role. Critics at the time were disappointed, believing the reveal robbed Laura of a sense of mystery and power. 


But that is the point.


The power of that image is meant to be punctured. Once we see the real person, we are meant to recognise how artificial it was. 


One key change in adaptation, the murder weapon, was a point of contention between the phallic symbolism of Caspary’s choice (a gun disguised in a cane) and Preminger’s belief in realism (the gun is hidden in a clock). 


I tend to side with Caspary - the symbolism is obvious now, but fits with Waldo’s character - the mix of urbanity, sex and hidden violence. 


Laura is a deceptively cool film - it is all glacial surfaces, hiding the boiling passions and unspoken desires of its characters.


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour


You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!


Sanjuro (Akira Kurosawa, 1962)

When his slumber is disturbed by a group of naive samurai, a nameless grizzled ronin (Toshiro Mifune) is drawn into their dilemma:

A group of corrupt local officials are conspiring to bring down the lord chamberlain, and have kidnapped him and his family.

The ronin reluctantly joins the bumbling warriors in trying to foil the 
villains' scheme.

In the course of this, he comes up with his own plan to bring down the schemers - from the inside...



“Good swords stay in their sheaths”


Yojimbo was one of the best first watches I have had in years, and I waited for an opportunity to see the sequel on the big screen.


Originally, this review was going to drop in 2024. When the 4K restorations of Akira Kurosawa’s films were released later that year, I bought a ticket for a Sanjuro screening.


Initially I found the set up to Sanjuro a little confusing. We open on the young samurai gathering to discuss their problems with their lord.


It is a little dialogue-heavy but it sets up one of the key dynamics of the film: the samurai deliberate on a problem - their lord refusing to accept their petition on corruption - only for the ronin to intervene and point out how they are on the wrong track.


As with the previous movie, the ronin has to match wits with a larger enemy - but he also has to look after a collection of other characters: the chamberlain’s wife and daughter, as well as the nine earnest samurai whose pride and lack of cynicism put them at risk.


Unlike the ronin’s first adventure, the stakes are higher than saving his own skin.


The film is almost like the set-piece with the family from the previous movie - except if the ronin had to save them for the length of a movie. 


This sense of tension has its comedic elements, but also means the movie is ultimately more dramatic.


I found it a little leaden - the nine samurai work as comic blob, but the film ends up feel a touch less fleet-footed.


I found myself starting to lose interest, but the ending completely reversed my feelings - the final scene not only elevates the film but takes it into its own space, apart from its predecessor.


Over the course of the film, the ronin has grown to loathe his key talent.


Confronted with the villains’ muscle, Muroto (Tatsuya Nakadai), a swordsman of comparable skill, Mifune’s swordsman is forced into a literal form of self-reflection.


Their final duel represents not just the death of Muroto, but the death of Mifune’s self-image.


Gone is the laconic loner; Sanjuro leaves his second adventure haunted by his own capacity for violence.


Related


Yojimbo


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!

Sunday, 22 March 2026

The Fast and the Furious!

The James Bond Cocktail Hour swaps martinis for Corona with 2001’s  The Fast and the Furious!


Check it out at the links here or wherever you get your podcasts.

Saturday, 14 March 2026

Some Kind of Wonderful (Howard Deutch, 1987)

Working-class kid Keith spends his days dreaming of becoming an artist while his anxious father (John Ashton) hopes he will settle for something more practical.


Keith also fantasises about the girl next door, Amanda Jones (Lea Thompson), who is ensconced into their school’s upper echelon.


When she breaks up with her cheating boyfriend Hardy (Craig Scheffer), Keith finds himself her unlikely rebound.


Keith’s seeming good fortune is a bombshell for his best friend, Watts (Mary Stuart Masterson), who has been quietly pining for him.


As Keith and Amanda prepare for their first date, Hardy plots his vengeance, while Watts wrestles with her feelings for her best friend.


The question becomes not whether the new couple will endure, but how their coming together will pull apart the world around them…



It is hard not to watch this movie without thinking of its predecessor.


Filmmakers will often return to similar themes and storylines - Howard Hawks with Rio Bravo, and Alfred Hitchcock with his ‘man on the run’ thrillers.


Some Kind of Wonderful was John Hughes’ attempt to make up for the concessions he made to the end of Pretty in Pink.


Tonally it is much darker, and more of a straight drama.


Watching this movie and Pretty in Pink, it hit me how much class has disappeared from movies like this.  


Amanda Jones is the girl down the street but because of her relationship with Craig Scheffer’s Hardy she has been elevated in the school’s social hierarchy.


Aside from the climax, Jones is the most significant improvement on the template of its predecessor.  


Whereas Pretty In Pink’s Blane (Andrew McCarthy) was a bit of a blank slate, Lea Thompson’s Amanda Jones is given an interiority.


Like the protagonist, she is trying to work out her own identity.


Our hero not only recognises the love he feels for his best friend, but the film does not treat Amanda as a catalyst for this realisation. She is given her own arc in which her breaking off from Keith is an act of independence - she does not feel any need to justify herself in relation to a man, or her old social set.


Keith also has to let go of the assumptions he has about her.


I have no real set feelings about lead Eric Stoltz. I have only seen a few of his performances, and this must be the most significant role I have seen him in.


My first awareness of him was probably the trivia about him playing Marty in Back to the Future.


He is well-cast as the artistically inclined Keith. He is more inherently intellectual and - crucially for the love story, there is a lack of horniness to the character that feels partly deliberate, and a result of the casting. Stoltz does not convey the kind of lust that was part of a lot of eighties teen movies.


The film also shows more nuance in how it presents Keith’s perspective. The character is more of a romantic, and does not seem that interested in Amanda as a sexual object. 


There is a certain ambiguity, or maybe hypocrisy to the character - the fact the date turns into a test of Amanda’s substance as a person shows Keith is as capable of being superficial as anyone else. 


 The character is self-absorbed - the fact he cannot see Watts’ interest in him being the bleedingly obvious example  - and the film punctures his assumed air of self-awareness. Stoltz manages to avoid tipping the character over into being cliche - one can imagine the character being played with a more overt lack of empathy, but Stoltz’s sincerity makes the character’s stumbles into misogyny more pointed.


Scheffer’s Hardy is more of an obvious problem, but Keith’s attitude and paranoia about Amanda is potentially more dangerous.


His feelings are not without merit - in a film that is aiming for realism, it makes sense that the character should be suspicious of his rapid change in romantic fortunes. But in the dinner scene, Keith is drawing on the same assumptions as Hardy.


It is a very nuanced character, and Stoltz does a very credible job. I do not think he has the same charisma or appeal as Ringwald, but his lowkey presence serving the more ensemble nature of this story.


As with Amanda Jones and Blane from Pretty in Pink, Watts is not a straight facsimile of Duckie. 


She is the yin to Keith’s yang - from their blurring of gender roles, to the way she grounds Keith’s flights of fancy, they are a platonic couple from the outset. 


This is personal bias but I also get more chemistry from Masterson and Stoltz than I do Ringwald and Cryer. 


According to the actress, Watts was originally meant to have a more ambiguous gender expression (the two lovers’ names were also reversed in earlier drafts of the script). During the course of rewrites, Hughes switched the names between Stoltz and Masterson’s characters, and the newly christened Watts was reworked to be more of a conventional love interest. 


Masterson is great, but I do wonder if the movie would have benefitted from the original conception of the character. 


The tone of this film is slightly more dramatic than Pretty in Pink. What humor there is comes from bad boy Duncan (Elias Koteas) who goes from being a potential antagonist to a friend - Koteas manages the difficult job of making the character amusing, but never loses the character’s sense of unpredictability or danger.


A fine film, and a fascinating companion piece to Pretty in Pink.


Related


Pretty in Pink


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!