Sunday, 20 September 2026

OUT NOW: Hope (Na Hong-jin, 2026)

When a creature lays waste to his village, a local cop (Hwang Jung-min) and a ragtag group of survivors head into the woods to uncover its origins - and into a showdown with its compatriots, who are on a mission of their own.





I am so glad I avoided the trailers for this one.


It earns its 160 minute runtime.


The film spends so much time on its opening setpiece, following the police chief as he struggles to keep up with the unseen ‘monster’ laying waste to his village.


Even before the creature is revealed, the film starts to problematise and muddy the clear demarcation between the humans and their strange adversary.


Our protagonist accidentally shoots a civilian, and it is not clear if he will cover it up.


He still tries to save him but leaves it to his accomplice to clean it up.


When the creature is finally shown, the film takes great pains to show its vulnerability.


It can take more punishment than a human, but it is still wounded, and shows pain.


Its rage is further grounded by the obvious tears in its eyes - a mystery that the film resolves around midway through the film.


Stories of the film’s Cannes reaction had primed me somewhat, but the visualisation of the aliens worked for me. Part of it is the careful use of practical special effects to showcase their sheer power, and the emphasis on creating tactile physics for the CGI characters.


They are fast and can jump, but their movements have a sense of weight and physical exertion.


Most of the film is focussed on the human characters but these moments with the antagonists mean the film turns into a juggling match of audience identification - particularly after it is revealed a casual act of human cruelty is responsible for the entire calamity.


The aliens only speak halfway through, and we only get subtitles in the closing scenes.


Halfway through the film, the film’s Hollywood imports are revealed: I was a little unsure at first  (Taylor Russell gets the least screen time), but Vikander and especially Fassbender are clearly identifiable.


I am not that familiar with the Korean cast, but they are great, walking the line between human tragedy and cartoon farce, from Hwang Jung-min as the chief - exasperated, terrified and out of patience - to Ahn Nak-yeon as a retired military man who gets roped into the action.


The most iconic character is officer Im Sung-ae (Jung Ho-yeon), a policewoman who gets an all-timer entrance, driving into the middle of the war zone with a carload of heavy artillery.


Following another extended set-piece in the woods, the finale turns into a deranged Looney Toon as our human protagonists try to outrace the aliens while trying a mid-chase dismount involving a horse.


The film then throws the viewer into the aliens’ POV, with an info dump of names and concepts that are never fully explained. It could be infuriating, but I left the film excited.


It made me want to watch the movie again - and if there is a sequel, I am there on day one.


While it ends on a vaguely cosmic, suddenly tragic note, it is worth emphasising how funny the movie is: from the recurring bit of everyone in the village having guns, to a local hunter’s protracted monologue about discovering the aliens while taking a shit in the woods.


One interesting aspect of this flashback that relates to the film’s focus on perspective is that all the aliens look like the first alien we see - it is revealed to be Officer Im’s imagined idea of the old man’s story (when we do see the aliens, they are all distinct from each other).


The film is also filled with vivid human creeps - the lip-smacking sociopath (Eum Moon-suk) hiding a clue to the mysterious visitors is the closest thing the film has to an outright villain.


I am so eager to read more around the film - the monster appearing on the border feels like an image weighted with subtext.


A fantastic oddity, Hope is one of the most memorable films I have seen this year.

Saturday, 19 September 2026

OUT NOW: Resident Evil (Zach Cregger, 2026)

Bryan (Austin Abrams), a medical courier, is given a last-minute job to deliver a mysterious package to Raccoon City. 


As Bryan nears his destination, he slowly realises the town has been overcome by some kind of malignant force - and his package may be the key to stopping it.



I have never played Resident Evil, and maybe seen 15 minutes of the 2002 movie almost twenty years ago. This movie was only on my radar because of Zach Cregger.


I loved Barbarian. I didn't like Weapons as much - it felt too scattered in focus. 


Resident Evil is more in line with Barbarian, in its focus on a single character unknowingly descending deeper into peril.


It is also engineered to ratchet up the tension, providing set ups that are often as funny as they are nerve-shredding.


There is no line between the mechanics of horror and comedy, and Cregger runs between the two like a veteran veteran jazz player - seemingly unpredictable but completely locked in. 


Austin Abrams is an empathetic anchor as the unlucky courier whose dedication to the job masks a desire to avoid confronting problems at home.


What works about the character and the film is that his early actions - which are fairly familiar for protagonists in horror - make sense: his ignorance comes across as human rather than mandated by the filmmakers.


After a strange woman walks in front of his car, and then disappears after he hits her, he follows her trail into the woods because he thinks he is helping a car accident victim.


The film plays like a quest narrative, with our hero wandering through a series of vignettes - a dark wooded road, a farmstead, a sewer, a street - which each present our hero with a unique environment, cast and obstacle to overcome.


These darkly comic set-pieces - including an encounter with a hilariously mismatched Paul Walter Hauser and Kali Reis as corporate employees who escort Bryan for part of his journey.


A perfectly engineered crowdpleaser. I have not had such a good time in theatres in a while.


Related


Barbarian


Weapons


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!

Wednesday, 16 September 2026

The James Bond Cocktail Hour: Furious 7 (James Wan, 2015)

Our hosts are joined by Mike Scott (Action for Everyone, Adkins Undisputed) to discuss the franchise's farewell to star Paul Walker.


Check it out at the link below or wherever you get your podcasts.

Related reviews

The Fast and the Furious

2 Fast 2 Furious 

Fast and the Furious - Tokyo Drift 

Fast & Furious 

Fast Five 

Fast & Furious Six 

Furious 7

If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!

Saturday, 12 September 2026

OUT NOW: Spider-Man: Brand New Day (Destin Daniel Cretton, 2026)

Two years after leaving his friends behind, Peter Parker (Tom Holland) is singularly focused on life as Spider-Man.


As he tackles a unique new foe, Peter is forced to confront his lingering feelings for MJ (Zendaya).



I have not watched a Spider-Man movie since I reviewed Across the Spider-Verse three years ago. 


I was not the biggest fan of the last three Tom Holland-led Spider-Man movies. 


I was a big Spider-Man fan as a kid, mostly through random issues, the nineties cartoon and the associated toyline (from memory, I had a Dr Octopus figure).


I was really into animals as a kid, so Spider-Man and his rogues gallery captured my imagination.


The first extended run of Spider-Man I read was the first several issues of Ultimate Spider-Man (I think I started to fall off when they introduced Venom).


Ironically, when the webhead made it to the big screen, I was not swept up.


I did not even hate the Raimi trilogy - for some reason, they just washed over me. 


On the re-watch before No Way Home came out, I could appreciate them more - I do not think Raimi will ever quite be to my taste, but the films are far more thought thorough and singular than I remembered. 


They highlighted the flaws of the other films, including the Holland pictures. 


Regarding the latter, I was frustrated that while I enjoyed the chemistry between the actors, the Marvel-led franchise refuses to have Peter deal with any tough life choices.


The end of No Way Home felt like the filmmakers finally acknowledging this, by having Peter lose all the Stark-based tech, and having to deal with personal tragedy. 


I do not think characters need to experience death in order to experience growth. My hope was that when Peter returned, it would be as a regular Joe - someone who has to balance superheroics with more familiar everyday problems: finding work, making rent, dating and friends in a new place.


Some of this has already been mined in the Raimi films, but that was twenty years ago: what does life look like for Peter Parker in the 2020s?


Brand New Day picks up following the fallout of the last film, with Peter separated from his friends and holed up on his own. 


The strongest aspect of the film is this emotional through line. 


Our hero continues to follow his friend’s lives on social media, while his own life outside the mask is non-existent.


He is caught in arrested development.


It is almost a metaphor for the MCU, which is depressing - as the film ultimately runs away from having Peter make a really difficult choice. 


Watching the film, it feels like it is building towards Peter moving on.


Rian Johnson was quoted calling drama having characters make the most difficult choices, and this film bottles it.


It clearly paid off as this film was a huge hit, but it is ultimately why I question whether Holland’s tenure will endure. I was struggling to remember the film the following day.


It is frustrating because Peter’s antagonist is someone who is stuck with making tough choices.


If Peter had chosen to leave his old life behind, then he would have been a better emotional space to confront this individual.


The supporting cast are fun (particularly Jon Bernthal as the Punisher), and some of the set-pieces feel a little more unique, but fundamentally MCU’s Spider-Man is still in training wheels.


Monday, 31 August 2026

Christopher Walken, Solider of Fortune: McBain (James Glickenhaus, 1991)

When his friend is killed attempting to overthrow the cartel-backed dictator of Colombia, Vietnam veteran Bobby McBain (Christopher Walken) gathers a team of old friends to avenge him.



A more cartoonish take on the men-on-a-mission template than 1980’s The Dogs of War, McBain marks Christopher Walken’s return to the world of mercenaries and coups.


Walken seems less invested here, but the movie around him as a ridiculous confection of action movie cliches - and I mean that as a compliment.


You know what kind of movie you are in when a rebel - dressed as a sex worker - sneaks under the president’s desk, unzips his fly and holds a knife against his nethers while other rebels take the more straightforward approach of just drawing guns on everybody.


It makes for a good double with the Chuck Norris vehicle, Delta Force 2, which came out a year earlier. Both films exploit the more fascistic, paranoid aspects of the action genre, with cartoonish stories of US soldiers going outside the law to bring down a South American dictatorship. As with that film, the Philippines acted as the stand-in for the third act.


Opening with a Vietnam flashback - in which McBain is rescued by retreating US soldiers - McBain bears no relationship with the fictional film series from the Simpsons, but it feels like an unofficial tribute:


Our hero is introduced in a primitive version of the thunderdome from Mad Max 3


Glickenhaus is not a great filmmaker - his storytelling is ridiculously simplistic - but he has an eye for real locations and in-camera effects.


He also had good relationships in New York City, and this results in some real production value: 


  • a real truck crushing a car on the side of a street
  • A stunt man plummeting from an apartment to the ground below
  • McBain and co. suspending a Mafioso Don off a real building


When Maria Conchita Alonzo meets Christopher Walken on top of a bridge, the actors are on top of a real bridge with the city behind them.


After the film gets underway, it turns into a series of OTT setpieces. Even the connective tissue has the feel of an action sequence: The cartel leaders introduce themselves by throwing a victim out of a window of the presidential palace.


And while the film is aiming for a more mainstream audience, the film is filled with touches which feel straight out of an exploitation movie: After a teenage rebel sacrifices himself to blow up a tank, his charred body grotesquely dangles from the tank’s turret.


The movie’s underlying concerns are those of the Eighties: shame about Vietnam (the defeat, rather than the reasons for the war), and the myth of missing POWs.


Ultimately, this is a movie about old men regaining their mojo through violence.


There is no real villain - the dictator is a puppet and the drug lords run as soon as the revolution starts. In a moment that feels like a gag from a Rainer Wolfcastle movie,  McBain falls through the ceiling to kill the president as he prepares to shoot himself.


Its politics are hideous, and the script is less complex than an episode of GI Joe but I loved every minute of it.


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!