Sunday, 11 August 2024

Longlegs (Osgood Perkins, 2023)

A young FBI agent (Maika Monroe) is on the trail of a mysterious figure known as Longlegs. 


She has no idea who this person is - just that it is a name on a series of notes left at a series of murder-suicides.


As she draws closer to the truth, the investigator finds herself unravelling the mysteries of her own past.



I have never seen any of Osgood Perkins’ previous movies.


I remember some film critic on a podcast I cannot remember bringing up his work - and because of his lineage - I caught his name coming up on new projects, and this one was the first of his films I could see.


My first observation about the film is that it is set in a pre-internet age - starts in the Seventies, with most of the contemporary action taking place in the mid-nineties.


I have to put this down to the film’s increasingly religious and supernatural bent. It deprives the characters and the viewer of an easy out.


The film ratchets up the tension, and becomes increasingly surreal as the film moves from being a straightforward(ish) thriller to something untethered from empiricism and tangible reality.


I was exhausted watching it and I think I might have dozed midway as our heroine is searching through her belongings - I know it was this scene because when she finds the information she was looking for I jumped fully awake.


Consider this a review with a footnote.


There is some wonderful imagery - Alicia Witt’s reappearance through the car rear window, and then appearing to float up to the front window.


The ending felt underwhelming - simultaneously not definitive and not ambiguous enough to remain unnerving.


I did not have time to digest the movie because my phone went off with news about the assassination attempt on Trump.


Longlegs went on the backburner. Who cares about satanism when real life fascism is working its real magic?


A few weeks later, the film still lingers.


Opening within a limited 1:1 frame, the film immediately shows its credentials as a thriller (the filmmaker’s control of what you can see and when) and one of the film’s underlying themes: the limits of perception and experience, and the effect of time on memory.


That frame-with-a-frame and the way story information is shown or withheld immediately creates a tension that the film maintains throughout.


What is impressive is that the film’s revelations only add to the tension and create more questions.


Longlegs himself remains a powerful figure on and offscreen.


The plot vaguely follows the form of a mystery - but it never loses that foreboding, that almost cosmic level of dread. The fact that film takes place in the mid-nineties, before the internet replaced the unknown with TMI, feels especially pertinent to the film’s particular brand of uncanny hijinks.


It might have taken a few days, but the movie is sticking with me. I am keen to watch it again - and check out Perkins’ other directorial efforts.


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


The Two Mrs Carrolls (Peter Godfrey, 1947)

Sally Morton (Barbara Stanwyck) is the second wife of artist Geoffrey Carroll (Humphrey Bogart). Carroll’s previous wife died of an illness shortly after the pair met.


The only trace of the first Mrs Carroll is her daughter Beatrice (Ann Carter), and an unsettling portrait her husband made of her.


Life should be good. But Geoffrey seems distracted, both by his work, and another woman (Alexis Smith).


And then Sally falls ill…


Is the second Mrs Carroll to be followed by a third?



After last year, I knew I would eventually check back in with the filmography of Mr Bogart. 


A suspense melodrama in the mould of Gaslight, The Two Mrs Carrolls sounded like an interesting re-entry point. 


No use delaying it: this movie is bad. It took me a few goes to actually finish it, and there were too many points where I lost track or got bored and had to rewind the film for things I had missed.


Something is off from the beginning.


The critical consensus seems to be that Bogart is miscast. That is an understatement.

The whole movie is miscast, down to the smallest bit player. This movie was made Stateside, and cannot hide it.

Straight out of the gate, Stanwyck is off - the accent can be forgiven, but she has nothing to do as the pure white Sally. Stanwyck is so innately intelligent and strong-willed, the character feels like caricature of the helpless damsel.

The script seems oddly structured for a suspense movie - we meet our central couple in medias res, in the fresh bloom of romance.

But we never get a sense of the relationship - the whole movie is on fast forward, blowing through any chance to let the characters breath, and for actual suspense to build.

We never meet the original Mrs Carroll - she dies in a cut and then we cut forward to Sally, married and content.

The writing is god awful, full of exposition which is deployed in the wrong places.

There is no tension and no sense of stakes. And because the film is so similar to Gaslight and other Bluebeard narratives, it just feels pointless. About halfway through I started daydreaming about a gender-flipped version of the story, with Stanwyck as the homicidal artist and Bogart as the hapless victim.

Hapless is pretty good word for Bogart. He seems checked out, or unsure of how to convey the character’s pathology. He is not as bad as I was led to believe, but he never convinces as either a lover or a murderer.

The major culprit for the film’s failure is director Peter Godfrey.

The film is shot so perfunctorily, with poor blocking and un-dynamic compositions, it ends up as a static bore. With such a familiar subject, this is a film begging for a filmmaker who can lean into the gothic atmosphere the script is clearly demanding.

The only scene with any juice is the reveal of the second Mrs Carrolls’ portrait. 

The camera stays on Sally’s face as she approaches the portrait, and the delayed cut to her grotesque doppelgänger is genuinely shocking.

It is rare that a film manages to create an in-world piece of art that provokes the same reaction the characters have, and Sally’s painting is worth the slow tease.

It is a pity the rest of the movie cannot match it.



Thematically the film has potential - a man externalising his misogyny into art, using women as muses until he runs out of inspiration and then destroying them via canvas and murder.

There is something to be unpacked there.

But if you want to watch a Bogart movie about a self-destructive artist in a doomed romance, you are better off with In a Lonely Place.

Related 






If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Friday, 9 August 2024

The Sword of Doom (Kihachi Okamoto, 1966)

An unfeeling swordsman (Tatsuya Nakadai) hacks his way through life, without fear of consequence.


But consequences are coming - and they are even more remorseless than he is.





The Sword of Doom is a title I remember reading about years ago. I used to love finding books on genres I never had access to.


I’ve mentioned it before but my access to movies was limited by resources and availability. It was not until streaming - and a working knowledge of local Arthouse schedules - that I have been able to fill gaps.


I became aware of those gaps from books. My university library boasted a large number of film history and genre studies books which became treasure trove for movies I was not able to see.


One of those genres was jidaigeki, period films often featuring samurai. 


You could find the big titles in stores (mostly Kurosawa), but these books dived beyond the familiar titles, to filmmakers and movies which you could not find.


The Sword of Doom is an evocative title, and it stuck in my head for over a decade.


Thankfully, I could not remember anything about the plot, so I booked a ticket without even a clue for what I was about to see.


The tale of an evil samurai and how he sows the seeds of his own doom, Sword is a bleak but arresting slow burn.


Part of that effect may be my own ignorance - for the first half I found the cuts between the two main storylines confusing. For some reason I missed that Omatsu (Yoko Naito) was the girl from the first scene.


The introduction to our villain is a great rug pull - he murders an old man praying at a Buddhist shrine.


From that moment on, nothing feels safe. Ryunosuke Tsukue (Nakadai) is completely selfish and uncompromising in pursuing whatever he wants.


There does not even seem to be that much of a thought process behind his actions. He is the world’s greatest swordsman, and no one can stand in his way.


When his opponent’s wife Hama begs him to lose their upcoming match, he demands her body as a trade. 


He is completely without remorse. Every time it feels like he might be haunted or second-guessing, he covers with violence or some other voice.


And as his actions grow more depraved, he seems to become more confident and less disturbed by his own capacity for evil.


In the lead role, Nakadai is hypnotising. With his large eyes and poise, he is almost otherworldly.


Toshiro Mifune briefly appears as a sword instructor - he gets one standout action sequence, gracefully destroying a band of ronin in the snow.


There is something haunting about the film, an uncanny feeling every time the swordsman appears on screen.


He is often shot in separate coverage, dead-on or in profile, reinforcing the sense of an otherworldly figure who is disrupting the diegesis.


The film’s third act is remarkable for the way it frustrates expectations.


Once our hero and heroine (Omatsu) are finally together - and once he figures out who she is - it is like all the bad karma and ghosts of his past actions finally catch up with him.


We have been led to believe he is going to engage in a duel with the brother of the swordsman he killed at the beginning.


It never happens.


Driven mad, he hacks his way through his own gang.


Surrounded by bodies and heavily wounded, he lunges at the camera and the movie freezes.


Beautifully shot by Hiroshi Murai, the film makes great use of deep focus and heavy chiaroscuro, turning the film’s limited by striking locations (the misty woods where the swordsman is ambushed, and the snowy exterior set where Mifune buzz saws through an army of goons are amazing).


The Sword of Doom is fantastic.


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Tuesday, 6 August 2024

Edge of Darkness (Martin Campbell, 2010)

In this season of The James Bond Cocktail Hour podcast, we are covering the six year gap between Licence to Kill and GoldenEye, covering everything James Bond-related, from books to comics to video games, to non-Bond properties which tried to fill the gap.


Curiosity got the better of us and we decided to check out the 2010 Hollywood remake of the miniseries Edge of Darkness!

Check out the episode at the link below:


























Edge of Darkness: Compassionate Leave

Edge of Darkness: Into the Shadows

Edge of Darkness: Burden of Proof

Edge of Darkness: Breakthrough

Edge of Darkness: Northmoor 

Edge of Darkness: Fusion


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!