Friday, 28 February 2025

OUT NOW: The Brutalist (Brady Corbet, 2024)

László Tóth (Adrien Brody) an architect and Holocaust survivor comes to America seeking a new life.


Scraping by with menial jobs, Tóth has put his vocation aside.


Tóth is given a chance to create his own American dream when a wealthy benefactor Harrison Lee Van Buren (Guy Pearce) presents him with an opportunity…



It is incredible how one creative choice can influence the entire effect of a movie - even a near-four hour epic.


It is hard to write about movies in the heat surrounding their release.


I sometimes find it hard to write something about a new movie when I see a critical consensus forming. Am I just regurgitating what other people are thinking? Am I reacting to said critique rather than the movie itself?


It is something I wrestle with all the time, and I keep coming back to the same conclusion.


We do not exist in a vacuum, and it is pointless to write like there is no context around whatever I am writing about. We are not just engaging with the text, but with the world around it - not just the criticism around the movie, the movie’s publicity or even the viewing experience.


I took a while to put this review out because I was waiting for all the opinions I had heard and read to settle, and for my own thoughts to coalesce. 


In the end, I decided to just write it up and put it out. 


I treat any review as a single impression caught in time. As soon as I put out a review, I do not treat that opinion as sacrosanct. 


The Brutalist is a movie about creative expression. It would be easy to say it feels like a metaphor for working as an artist within capitalism, but that is literally what it is about. 


As a movie about America and the immigrant experience, it is basically a nightmare.


Almost as soon as László is on his own, he is surrounded by people who are trying to use him, like he is a tool that can be picked up and discarded.


He is also treated like a transitory being, like a visitor who will not be staying.


His status and background are constantly questioned. There are a lot of scenes where László is the subject of an audience - almost like he is one of his buildings.


Lazlo only becomes vaguely accepted when he shows a talent that can be commercialised.


His patron Van Buren only becomes interested in Lazlo when the library adds to his own reputation.


Even his cousin Attila (Alesandro Nivola), who he comes to live with, sees him in terms of his ability to generate profit.


He is jealous of Lazlo, an unstated tension that runs through their scenes together.


The only reason he seems to tolerate Lazlo is because of his talent - like Van Buren, he sees a use for Lazlo, and only tosses him out when their project backfires. 


Attila has completely assimilated, changing his name,marrying a gentile, and even fabricating his business (Miller & Sons) to create a sense of long-term history. He wants to be seen as not just belonging in America, but as having always belonged here.


His attempt at a community centre is the site of struggle, between Lazlo’s own desires, Van Buren’s, and the community this place is ostensibly meant to serve.


Like a lot of artistic people in his position, Lazlo’s artistry is figuring out a way to make that work.  


For most of its runtime, I was totally onboard with The Brutalist


Despite its size, I appreciated how the film managed to develop its themes with relative subtlety and respect for the viewer’s intelligence.


Van Buren’s sexual assault on Lazlo is the moment in the movie that I trip over. It feels like the filmmaker has lost faith in the rest of the film for conveying the idea of Lazlo’s exploitation. It felt melodramatic in a way that was different from other parts of the movie. 


That choice is so explicit in its meaning that it retroactively made me question the movie leading up to it.


For me, it overwhelmed the rest of the movie.


I want to watch the movie again because that chunk of the movie following Van Buren’s assault on Lazlo felt off on my viewing.


We learn of Lazlo’s intention behind his vision but whatever impact that was supposed to have was completely robbed by what came before.


The standout of the cast is Guy Pearce - he is fire contained. Despite manners and placid exterior, there is a tension to the character, an internal rage that is hypnotising.


Van Buren presents himself as a blue blood, but he is new money. He was able to bring himself to fortune, and shows no willingness to help anyone else.


He is the movie at its best - representing a venomous version of American capitalism and masculinity that will sadly endure.


I want to give the film another watch, because I am still not sure I got what the film was aiming for. There is something missing and it only becomes clear during the final scene when we are finally given a reason for the character’s obsessive perfectionism on this project.


There is no sense of catharsis or revelation. It almost feels like an add on - although that might just be the stylistic changes.  Maybe that is the point.


It is magnificent to watch. The Vistavision photography is eye-catching at times - the shots of the quarry, the long, extended of the train accident - when the movie is at a remove it is almost more effective.


I was not as enraptured as other people, and maybe the hype got in the way, but The Brutalist is definitely worth a look.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!

Thursday, 27 February 2025

Witness (Peter Weir, 1985)

When a small Amish boy (Lukas Haas) witnesses a murder, it falls to police officer John Book (Harrison Ford) to protect him and his mother (Kelly McGillis).


I do not get too many moments where I feel the hairs rise on the back of my neck. 

I got one in Witness.


It is the moment in the third act when Samuel (Lucas Haas) and his grandfather ring the bell and turn to find their entire community running towards them.


Part of it has to do with how beautifully constructed the movie is.


Part of it comes from when I watched it - a few days against the US election, won by someone who stood against the values this movie so eloquently espouses.

 

Witness is one of those movies I wish I had gotten around to sooner.


Rather than treating the Amish community as objects to be gazed at, the movie opens among them.


Amid the everyday goings on of the people, we are introduced to Rachel at her husband’s funeral. We are introduced to her family, and potential suitor Daniel (future Die Hard henchman Alexander Godunov)


We are slowly introduced to the contemporary world through Amish eyes.


  • Young Samuel’s witnessing of the murder


This movie is so well-structured, writing about it feels like writing a plot synopsis.


Peter Weir keeps his focus on the performer’s faces.


This is a quiet movie where everything is expressed in the eyes.


There is a version of this story that would foreground the genre elements.


Instead, that focus on understanding every character gives the piece a more subtle, organic tension.


Harrison Ford’s John Book initially feels like stock - a dogged, honourable cop. He is a man familiar with the underworld, a dogged professional with no personal life.


The traits which would mark him as a traditional action hero of the eighties are highlighted as flaws.


Book is a man of short temper and self-reliance - qualities which put him at odds with the Amish.


Wounded and abandoned by his compatriots in the police, he is left at the mercy of the people he is trying to protect.


Ford is fantastic, with his inherent anger channelled into the portrait of a man who is finally forced to unwind, and reconsider every aspect of his life.


I was fascinated by the portrayal of the villain.


At no point does Josef Sommer or the character appear to be more threatening than he is. 


He is not a villainous mastermind.


He comes across as pathetic, someone who is self-aware enough to recognise his corruption could doom him as easily as it could give him profit.


The final confrontation carries more emotion than a generic thriller standoff.


It is a chaotic, awkward back and forth, with Sommer playing Schaeffer as ashamed and terrified.


It is not pointed out but it is an interesting choice to have the character be German American - ancestrally from the same place as the Amish community Book stands with.


I love the smallness of the final shot:


Book drives away, briefly pausing to meet Daniel as he walks toward Rebecca’s home. 


The camera stays in a long shot; we do not hear anything they say and we do not need to. 


There is a sense of reconciliation and closure.


Life will go on.


Order has not been restored, but reoriented.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!

OUT NOW: The Gorge (Scott Derrickson, 2025)

Two snipers (Miles Teller and Anya Taylor-Joy) with allegiances have been tasked with guarding the opposite sides of a mysterious gorge.


Something is in the gorge. And these two have to make sure it never gets out.


As time passes and their loneliness grows, the two strangers are drawn together.


In trying to reach each other, the pair are forced to uncover the mysteries of the gorge. 



The Gorge is not a good movie.


The premise is fun - the set-up for either a pleasing b-movie or something introspective.


The film tries to thread the needle between potboiler and bodice-ripper, anchoring the movie around a romantic storyline.


In many ways, it reminded me of Heart Eyes - like that movie, it is a strait-laced love story.


There is no winking or joking (aside from an over-confident in-joke about the stars’ most famous roles).


Teller is fine as the emotionally stunted American, while Taylor-Joy brings a welcome dose of whimsy and humour as his counterpart - a great puncturing of the stereotype of the silent Russian killer.


That commitment to the love story is the most interesting aspect of the movie.


The early interplay between the characters is helped by Teller and Taylor-Joy having good chemistry. You buy their attraction so much that when he finally decides to cross the gorge, you buy it.


The love story is so potent that when the movie shifts back toward the plot, it loses its mojo.


Scott Derrickson is an established genre filmmaker, and makes a decent fist of the early action scenes. The atmosphere is deflated by an over-reliance on CGI to render the villains.


This is an okay movie that is touching greatness.


The love story is compelling, but focus of the movie is a supernatural horror-action piece that never feels as fully-realised.

BITE-SIZED: Colossus of New York (Eugène Lourié, 1958)

When his genius son (Ross Martin) is killed in a tragic accident, brain surgeon William Spensser (Otto Kruger) steals his brain.

Believing it would be a waste to humanity if such a mind was lost, he preserves his son’s brain in a metal-encased automaton.

This radical experiment is a success, but as his son gains more control over his new form, he begins to lose a grip on the thing his father prized most…


Generally when a film is obscure, it does not bode well.

A Cold War-era variation on the Frankenstein story, Colossus is a quietly disturbing piece of body horror. 

The premise played totally straight, and the emphasis is on how the central character’s new state is torturous. When he comes to life, it is with a distorted, mechanised scream.

The creature design is wonderfully creepy - a carved blank face with glowing eyes.

The sound design also helps to create that sense of exertion  - every time the title character moves, it is accompanied by sounds of electrical discharge. Everything about the colossus feels like it requires effort or pain.

I only found out about it about two years ago on Wikipedia. A quick check of the trailer increased my curiosity. At 70 mins, it plays like a short story, a moral fable about the dangers of eugenics.

The piano score by Van Cleave is unique and adds a haunting, discordant vibe to the piece.

Recommended.

If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!   

Tuesday, 25 February 2025

Amityville II - The Possession (Damiano Damiani, 1982)

Prior to the events of the original film, the home at 112 Ocean Avenue was owned by the Montelli family.


The forces inhabiting the house soon fixate on the family's weak points, exploiting the family's abusive dynamics to drive eldest son Sonny (Jack Magner) toward a heinous final act.


I have never read the book on which The Amityville Horror was based. I do not know enough to have an opinion on its validity as a historical document.


On the one hand, I find the idea of this movie having sequels completely understandable - it was a huge hit.


On the other talon I find it fascinating that this film - supposedly based on a true story - had any sequels at all.


There is something hilariously craven about the fact that both of the sequels to the first film were based on other non-fiction books by completely different authors. There is a strange purity to the way the producers continue to persist with the idea that these films are based on ‘real events’.


One almost wishes they had continued to a fourth entry based around producer Dino Delaurentis’ struggles to craft a fourth movie while being haunted by the houses’ supernatural forces.


Since the Lutzs’ story ended with the previous film (at least the most cinematic chunk of it), the filmmakers went the prequel route, and dramatised the real-life tragedy which started it all.


The DeFeo family’s fate was briefly shown at the start of the 1979 movie, but this film shows no fidelity to that depiction:


The familiar name is different and the portrayal of the eventual murderer is completely different.


Refreshingly, the film does feel like its own beast, and in certain respects, The Possession is a far tighter film than its predecessor.


Unlike the broad canvas of the first picture, the supernatural menace is focussed on the family.


In a way the film is clumsy - in the first couple of minutes, it feels like the filmmakers are trying to set up the characters as certain archetypes.


I am not saying this is the cause, but there is a certain heightened quality to the performances that feels like the effect of having a director (director Damiano Damiani) operating in a second language he cannot speak.


The film wants to have its cake and eat it - the supernatural forces are both capable of manipulating the family’s existing weaknesses, and taking direct action to destroy the family.


The film does not try to be ambiguous, showing the spectral forces’ work around the house, but what makes it more consistently effective than the chaos of the first film is that the actions we see (painting sacrilegious images in the kid’s room, banging on the door) are meant to provoke tensions within the family unit.  


While James Brolin's George Lutz is on a slow boil, the Montellis have already boiled over:


Patriarch Anthony (Burt Young) has a hair-trigger temper and is physically abusive toward his family; siblings Sonny and Patricia (Diane Franklin) share an uncomfortably close bond; mother Dolores (Rutanya Alda), the spiritual leader of the family, to powerless to help her family.


It is a bleak movie, but there is something compelling about how consistently bleak it is. While I fault some of the choices, there is a sense of inevitability to the family’s fall that works.

 

It is also relatively simple, unlike its predecessor, where the subplot with the priest feels like padding.


Unlike Rod Steiger, James Olson's Father Frank Adamsky is more directly threaded with the family.


Olson and his character are the most interesting element of the film.


He is portrayed as an ordinary man trying to deal with the family in as judicious way as possible. At a crucial moment, he brushes off a call for help.

 

This guilt as much as anything pushes him to attempt an unsanctioned exorcism.


And the church he serves is shown as both all-powerful and ineffective. 


The one element that jostles is the performance of Magner - the other actors might be heightened, but they are more naturalistic and feel like they are reacting to each other. He seems a little more theatrical.

 

It is not necessarily bad, but it feels out of step with the style of the rest of the movie.

 

His portrayal was probably not helped by the script.


While the character is hearing voices tell him to kill his family, the film makes the bizarre choice to just turn it into a full-on possession.


Thus Sonny’s motivation is completely removed from his final action.


The result is less satisfying - having a child pushed to murder his family is scary enough.


By literalis-ing the possession, the film seems to be betraying its own theme of having the devil exploit and manipulate weakness.


The film fumbles the third act: having a guilt-ridden priest trying to save the souls of the family he failed to save in life, without the backing of his church, should pack a punch.


But with the family dead, the final exorcism feels like an unnecessary extension. It also feels far too indebted to The Exorcist in the imagery and the way the demon attempts to tempt the priest.


Bleak and somewhat frustrating, The Possession is still a superior film to its predecessor.


Related


The Amityville Horror


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!



Monday, 24 February 2025

Reunion with Death - Timothy Dalton's unmade fourth film

In this season of The James Bond Cocktail Hour podcast, we are covering the six year gap between Licence to Kill and GoldenEye, covering everything James Bond-related, from books to comics to video games, to non-Bond properties which tried to fill the gap.


On the latest episode of the podcast, we discuss two 'what ifs' of the Bond franchise:

Dalton's unmade fourth film, and the recently uncovered Bond audition tapes from the early 2000s.

Check out the episode at the link below:



























Edge of Darkness: Compassionate Leave

Edge of Darkness: Into the Shadows

Edge of Darkness: Burden of Proof

Edge of Darkness: Breakthrough

Edge of Darkness: Northmoor 

Edge of Darkness: Fusion












If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!