Wednesday, 11 October 2023

Men of War (Perry Lang, 1994)

Mercenary Nic Gunner (Dolph Lundgren) and a small team of other hired guns are sent to an obscure island in the Pacific Ocean to strong-arm the locals into selling the rights to their home to some unscrupulous businessmen.

But once on the island, the conflicted Gunner is forced to question the purpose of the mission, and why he is going through with it...


“We have a legend. It tells of a man who came from far across the ocean to save us from great danger.”

“Really?”

“No!”

After decades, Dolph Lundgren is starting to get more mainstream respect.

I have only watched a couple of his films, but every time I do, I wonder why I have not seen more.
After watching Red Scorpion, I was keen to revisit this 1994 joint.

I had watched it a couple of years ago, and I remember being rather taken with it.

Part of what makes it special might have to do with its creative pedigree: independent filmmaker John Sayles co-wrote the script and, like Sayles’ other genre efforts (Piranha, Alligator), Men of War plays with genre cliches and conventions to create something more unique.

Nick Gunner is set up as a white saviour, yet the story undermines every cliche.

He does not even foil the villains - it is BD Wong's Po, the island’s deceptively amiable translator. The team goes through a disgusting ceremony in which they have to consume old bird’s eggs - only for the tribe to laugh, revealing it was a practical joke.

Nick and the other mercenaries are presented as trigger-happy and out of their depth.

The action is plentiful if a little less inventive than the script.

While Lundgren, Wong and Charlotte Lewis play it straight, the rest of the squad are archetypes.

Trevor Goddard adds some flair as Keefer, a loose cannon who terrorises the team. His obsessions with Nick and near-orgasmic love of carnage are reminiscent of Vernon Welles’ Bennett from Commando (1985).

Benefiting from lush photography from Rohn Schmidt, in gorgeous Thai locations, Men of War feels bigger than the canvas probably was.

As for the star, Lundgren is well-cast as a burnt-out ex-super soldier seeking redemption. If he ever comes off a little stilted, it fits the character - a killer struggling to reconnect with his humanity.

Well-acted (Wong is fantastic), Men of War often feels like a meathead cousin to the socially conscious thrillers of the decade, like the Jack Ryan films. In some ways, this little action flick might be their superior.

If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!  

OUT NOW: Moscow Mission (Herman Yau, 2023)

Following a violent robbery on a Sino-Russian train, cop Cui Zhenhai (Hanyu Zhang) is sent to Moscow to hunt down the perpetrators, led by the mysterious ‘D’ (Xuan Huang).


While the Chinese agents arrive in Moscow, D is preparing for his next heist, and enlists the help of his old mentor, Vasily (Andy Lau), to prepare for it


As Cui closes in, a showdown is set in motion that could turn the city into a warzone…




The title is the only thing that is slightly underwhelming about this movie. 


Directed by Herman Yau, Moscow Mission is a relentless action thriller that never outlasts its welcome.



Filled with well-choreographed and shot action, Moscow Mission is one of the best action movies I have seen this year - the variety of locations and set pieces alone is one of the film’s strong points.


It is a grim affair - women are used and abused, the villain is a few shades off revealing himself as Satan, and there is no sense of humour to be spied. However, the film never feels oppressive. There was no point where I felt bored, or like the movie needed to end. This is an earnest action movie that does not waste its time, and escalates in terms of scale and originality of staging. 


The final sequence is pretty melodramatic, but it is in keeping with the movie as a whole.


The cast are solid: Hanyu Zhang as veteran cop Cui Zhenhai; Andy Lau as Vasily, a Chinese exile and black market wheeler-dealer; Xuan Huang as the villainous Miao Qingshan; His accomplice/brother Miao Ziwen (Jason Gu); and Janice Man as Li Suzhen, a female member of Miao’s gang, and Ziwen’s lover.


One of the more fascinating elements of the film is the Sino-Russian relationship, depicted through various dynamics: Cui and his best friend, an FSB agent; Miao’s relationship with blonde femme fatale Marina (Zina Blahusova); and even the rapport between the Chinese agents and the local police. 

 

Perhaps it is a bit of 2023, but the Chinese presence in the former USSR feels lopsided in terms of power - Russia is a chaotic environment which the more sophisticated Chinese cops have to navigate and figure out. 


Taking place in 1993, amid the chaos following the end of the USSR, the Russia of this movie resembles the ‘wild east’ depicted in Hollywood movies from the period - the state is corrupt and in semi-collapse, crime is rampant and money is to be made.


A genuinely exciting potboiler, Moscow Mission is worth a look.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!  

Friday, 6 October 2023

The Perfect Weapon (Mark DiSalle, 1991)

After his mentor (Mako) is murdered by a local gang, local hellraiser Jeff Sanders (Jeff Speakman) goes on the trail of the killers…



A starring vehicle for kenpō practitioner Jeff Speakman, The Perfect Weapon is a solid addition to the early nineties action catalogue.


Aside from Speakman, the film is notable for featuring an allstar Asian American cast: Mako, James Hong, Cary Hiryku-Takagawa and Professor Tanaka. One qualification with these big names is that they are all playing Korean American characters.


Speakman may be a bit blank as an actor, but his martial arts skills are terrific, and the filmmakers ensure they are displayed to the full (in clean wide shots) with rapid (but judicious) cuts.


His character - a loose cannon ostracised for both his temper and his lethal skillset - has potential to be a little more interesting than his logline. Everyone treats him like a violent lunk, just as dangerous as the gangsters terrorising the community. And despite growing up alongside this community, he is still an outsider - to the extent that, unlike most white martial arts heroes, he does not possess any special knowledge (or even speak the language).


And despite his prowess, villains can still get the jump on him. Speakman takes a lot of hits in his fight sequences, which follow a pattern of him taking a beating, figuring out his foe, and then unleashing. It is a refreshing narrative arc which prevents him from coming off as invulnerable but still highlights him as an exceptional fighter.


Running 86 minutes, The Perfect Weapon does not waste time. Mariska Hargitay appears as a childhood friend, but she gets no scenes or even dialogue. Clearly, edits were made that removed her subplot.


The film’s no-frills action plotting works in the movie (and star’s) favour.


It is a pity Speakman was not able to build on this film. 


One could see him taking up position alongside the other action stars of this period, like Seagal and Van Damme.  


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!  
 

Wednesday, 4 October 2023

NZIFF 2023: Sisu (Jalmari Helander, 2022)

As a group of Nazis retreat out of Finland, they decide to screw with an old gold prospector (Jorma Tommila) with a giant nugget.

Big mistake.





Styled as a western in narrative and iconography, Sisu is a straightforward underdog action movie. 

Jorma Tommila’s Aatami is your unstoppable hero, with a deadly skillset and superhuman will to survive.


The villains are a company of bandits, killing anyone who gets in their way for the hell of it.

 

There is nothing to Sisu.


This is not a historical movie - it is not interested in digging into Finland's involvement with the Axis. This is a movie about cutting a man’s throat and sucking on his exposed airpipe to grab a mouthful of air while you hide underwater from machine gunners on the surface. 


It is what it is - and it does what it does without wasting time.


Packed with gore and a deadpan sense of humour, it is a solid little genre flick.


Its familiarity is meant as a feature, not a bug - but I did find its familiarity, and simplicity, a little tired after a while. 



If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!  

NZIFF 2023: Phantom (Lee Hae-young, 2023)

It is 1933, decades into Japan's colonisation of Korea. After a failed assassination attempt on the new Japanese resident-general, five suspects are kidnapped by the Japanese authorities.

Imprisoned in a seaside hotel, they are pitted against each other as the Japanese try to figure out which one of them is the spy/Phantom who is trying to bring the regime down from within.


Set in 1933 Korea, Phantom is a fun mess of a movie. 


After a frustratingly elliptical opening sequence, the film begins cycling through different genres, premises and character dynamics. 


The second significant section is a locked-room mystery - a group of suspects are secured at a hotel while the Japanese try to force the Phantom to reveal themselves. With broad, archetypal characterisation, this sequence has the most tonal consistency, and feels a little listless - we are following so many characters, and it never feels like the tension is building.

 

When the movie turns into a buddy action flick, it is more fun.


While the film is rather stylish, and the action is well-shot and choreographed, the biggest issue is the script - the movie feels like it is ending several different times.


The most interesting element is Junji, a former cop who is tortured by his mixed Japanese-Korean heritage.


While he starts out  as a suspect, when the film’s initial villain dies, he takes his place - he sees this as an opportunity to prove himself to the regime.


The film explicitly becomes an allegory for the Korean peninsula, with Junji as its colonial past, and Park Cha-kyung and fellow Phantom Yuriko as its future in North and South.


There is probably some nuance and context I am missing - including some homage to Joseph von Stenburg’s Shanghai Express, which I have not seen - but subtlety is not this film’s interest.


As far as characters, Sol Kyung-gu manages Junji’s transition to full-on villain


Interestingly, he becomes the voice on Korea’s past and future, offering a monologue on how the future state will only succeed as part of an overseas empire. The fact that he is - shortly thereafter - defeated by representatives of the peninsula’s dual future - is a slightly hopeful rebuke. Whatever the peninsula’s future, it will not be dictated by fascists like Junji or the Japanese Governor-General.

 

While the cast are solid, Park So-dam (Parasite) is the standout as the gun-toting vamp Yuriko. Even when she is playacting the entitled shit, she steals every scene she is in. When she reveals her true colours, going Rambo on a hotel full of soldiers, she proves herself as an action star.

A movie that is better-made than it is written, Phantom gets more enjoyable as it goes along. I am usually more onboard with these kinds of maximalist genre exercises, but it is just a little too long and unfocused to fully get behind in its entirety.


I am curious to revisit it, to see if its narrative flows smoothly on the re-watch.


If any Korean readers would like to point out anything I have missed, drop a comment with your thoughts


Related


Inside


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!  

Tuesday, 3 October 2023

Silent Rage (Michael Miller, 1982)

When a genetically altered zombie escapes its lab, its only goal is to kill anything that gets in its way.

It falls to Sheriff Dan Stevens (Chuck Norris) to confront the monster - if he can.


Is this movie great?

I watched it years ago, and remember kind of liking it. I am not a Chuck Norris fan, and I am not that interested in going back to it.

But after watching a couple of Dolph Lundgren movies, I was keen to broaden out to other action stars I have not covered.

And with October upon us, I wanted to hit something with a horror slant.

Silent Rage is one of Norris's rare deviations outside the straight action film. I believe he has only one other horror film in his filmography (1994's Hellbound).

The opening sequence is completely disinterested in the expectations associated with its star. With its doom-laden synth score, and off kilter white-on-black titles, Silent Rage is closer in tone and style to the slasher template laid down by Halloween.

While Norris is famously wooden, the movie is surprisingly naturalistic - the interactions between the characters feel more thought out, and the supporting cast (particularly the mad scientist trio of Ron Silver, Steven Keats,  and William Finley) are all doing good work. 

And Norris is not bad - he seems to be genuinely engaged, particularly with love interest Toni Kalem and sidekick Stephen Furst (Animal House).

The biggest issue with the movie is that a lot of Norris’s scenes seem to be padding - a subplot of Stevens fighting a biker gang seems to exist solely to give the star something to do while scientists Ron Silver, Steven Keats,  and William Finley argue over the ethics of their undying creation.

On this viewing, those scenes did not register. The movie is decently paced, and when it comes to its set-pieces, it is genuinely effective.

There is some effective use of long takes and blocking to build suspense, particularly in the pair of stalking sequences which bracket the film.

In the film’s opening scene, the camera tracks John Kirby (Brian Libby) as he slowly cracks. The naturalistic sound design also plays a role, as the sounds of neighbourhood kids slowly grow in intensity. It is a subtle ratcheting up of tension which the film returns to again and again.

Slasher films can feel repetitive and uninspired in their use of familiar film grammar, but the filmmakers behind Silent Rage have a firm hand on how to milk their rather simple scenario.

Brian Libby is a terrific villain, Peter Bernstein and Mark Goldenberg‘s synth score is effectively eerie, and the film’s one (bad) fight scene does not undermine the film’s suspense. 

If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!  

Bond 17: The missing anniversary film

In this season of The James Bond Cocktail Hour podcast, we are covering the six year gap between Licence to Kill and GoldenEye, covering everything James Bond-related, from books to comics to video games, to non-Bond properties which tried to fill the gap.

On the latest episode, we complete our deep-dive into the 1991 draft for Timothy Dalton's Bond 17!


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!