A blog by Tim George. Follow my other work at http://www.tewahanui.nz/by/tim.george, http://www.denofgeek.com/authors/tim-george, and theatrescenes.co.nz.
Thursday, 17 November 2022
Lost Bullet (Guillaume Pierret, 2020)
Sunday, 13 November 2022
OUT NOW: Black Panther - Wakanda Forever
In 2018, Black Panther felt like a heist - it is rare to see a mainstream American movie deal with the realities of American/European colonial history, let alone a blockbuster instalment in the biggest franchise in the world - from Walt Disney, a company practised in crafting films which ignore that history.
At the end of the day, it is still a movie about people in super-powered suits fighting each other with super weapons, but with that added context, particularly in the characterisation of Killmonger (Michael B. Jordan), Black Panther feels almost subversive.
It also felt more like a singular film, and not a bridge between other instalments. I still have not seen Captain America - Civil War, and while watching Black Panther, it never feels like you are missing character or plot development.
It was a seismic event in 2018, a genuinely important film. But it also felt like its own story, with a specific point of view, and a sense of world-building and imagination that felt singular.
After watching Thor - Love and Thunder, I was slightly worried that Black Panther 2 would be more integrated into the Marvel machine, with any specificity or narrative deviations smoothed out.
While there are a couple of moments which feel crow-barred in, Wakanda Forever survives as its own entity.
With the passing of star Chadwick Boseman, and the decision to have his character die offscreen, Wakanda Forever was going to be a unique proposition.
This movie is based around T’Challa’s death, and the way the cast have to figure out how to move on. I was afraid that that real-word context would be cast away, or drowned out by the demands of setpieces, cameos and easter eggs for other movies.
The movie takes time to mourn the character’s death, and the interweaving of the characters grief with that of the actors mourning their colleague gives the film a metatextual charge. Death means something - not just loss, but a point of transition.
A recurring theme in Ryan Coogler's films (at least the ones I have seen) is their focus on a character wrestling with the legacy of a family or mentor figure - Adonis trying to find worth in the sport his father made his name in; T'Challa wrestling with the fallout of his family's tragic past.
Shuri is riddled with guilt over her brother's death, and is conflicted with the idea that her sudden shift in status will mean she will have to follow the traditions she has previously disregarded. When her mother (Angela Bassett) is killed, suddenly Shuri is forced out of her protective shell and into a leadership role.
I was impressed by how long it took for the reveal of the new Panther, and how the movie was based around Shuri wrestling with her brother’s legacy, and how to move on.
Even as she tries to deal with the arrival of Namor, and the machinations of the international community, the filmmakers do not take the easy path of making her Black Panther immediately.
Shuri, in the writing and Letitia Wright’s performance, is not prepared for that mantle. For a majority of the film, her central conflict is with herself, and her unwillingness to confront her feelings and grieve.
Even when she does inherit the mantle, it is not a sign of catharsis - she is in the wrong headspace for resolving the conflict with Namor, and is more obsessed with vengeance.
The filmmakers use the concept of meeting with the ancestors, which was a key element of the first film, to show Shuri’s fragile state - instead of her mother or brother, she is confronted by the spirit of Killmonger (Michael B. Jordan), the perfect avatar for her feelings of rage.
The climax is fascinating because while it has the architecture of a familiar action resolution (preparation, a big battle, a final showdown where our protagonist overcomes the odds), it lacks the clear moral divide that these kinds of set pieces usually have.
And Shuri’s actions come with a cost - it is not commented on in the text, but the film pays attention to showing Wakandan warriors being overwhelmed and killed by Namor’s forces. It helps that this battle - while augmented with CGI - is mostly based around human characters engaging in hand-to-hand combat. There is a visceral impact, tension and sense of loss to this scene that adds to the tragedy of Shuri’s descent into vengeance.
Like most blockbusters, Wakanda Forever is too long. There is a subplot involving Martin Freeman which should have been - at least - cut down, and the introduction of Ironheart feels like one character too many.
But I forgive it because for the most part, these extraneous elements do not negate or undermine the central thrust of the story. This is a movie where it is good that it takes its time.
The mutant leader of a race of water-breathers who are the descendants of a group of Mayans who fled the Spanish conquistadors, Namor will do anything to protect his people. He is no power-hungry tyrant, or agent of chaos.
In an ingenious touch, the character is hundreds of years old, which means he is a record-keeper of the horrors he is shielding his people from (in flashback, he is shown as a child witnessing the Spanish’s abuses).
Technically, the real villain is the Americans and Europeans. Their obsession with finding new sources of vibranium leads them to Namor’s kingdom, and leads him to contact Wakanda. This movie emphasises the ripple effects of geopolitical power plays as much as it does personal decisions, and they are fully perfectly integrated.
It continues the series’ emphasis on history, and the continuing impact of colonisation, both in terms of the African diaspora (a section of the film is set in Haiti) and indigenous people (Talokan).
While the resolution of Namor and Shuri’s conflict is good, with all the extra plotlines it feels slightly anticlimactic - it almost feels like we are about to get another showdown (after so many die, I was thinking there would be some kind of rebellion or discontent with Namor/Shuri’s leadership).
Thankfully, the movie ends on a quiet note, as Shuri burns her mourning garments on a beach, and begins to cry.
Even the obligatory mid-credits scene is a continuation of this moment, rather than a teaser for some other movie. It felt a little cute to me - the ending is so poignant on its own - but it is not detrimental.
A fine memorial to its star, Wakanda Forever manages to thread the needle between a meditation on grief and blockbuster thrills.
Saturday, 12 November 2022
Bodies Bodies Bodies (Halina Reijn, 2022)
When the host is discovered dead, the guests hunt for the perpetrator.
Since the hurricane has cut them off from the outside world, the list of potential suspects is not long…
The ending of Bodies Bodies Bodies makes this movie.
That is the function of a good ending - it defines what the movie is ultimately about.
What starts out as a murder mystery ends as a statement about people’s inner lives, the lies we tell each other and ourselves, and what motivations ultimately drive our actions. It is also about how social media completely dominates our interpersonal relationships.
It is also a story about the narratives we build about ourselves (especially in terms of social media), and how we build stories out of incidents and people.
Ultimately its catalyst, what would be the set up to a million who-done-its, sets the stage for deeper revelations about its characters and their relationships to each other (magnified when they are forced to deal with each other without a wifi connection).
This is one of the running themes of detective fiction - in the pursuit of the mystery, secrets are uncovered, reputations destroyed and pretences exposed.
Bodies Bodies Bodies takes that idea and removes the murderer.
We are introduced to a group of characters who are familiar with each other, but there is an edge to their reunion.
For the most part, we are aligned with Bee’s (Maria Bakalova) perspective, as the outsider to the group.
There are various red herrings - mostly based on personal pressure points and sudden realisations that characters are so self-absorbed they have never bothered to learn about each other.
The cast (Amandla Stenberg, Bakalova, Myha'la Herrold, Chase Sui Wonders, and Rachel Sennott) are all terrific.
Sennott steals the show as Alice, the group’s loudest and least enlightened member.
Lee Pace plays Alice’s older and somewhat mysterious paramour, Greg.
Pete Davidson plays David, whose family owns the house and becomes the movie’s first body (body body). He leans into the character’s hollowness and self-loathing. He is hilariously awful.
Sometimes it is the little things that throw you off balance.
I really enjoyed this movie but I left with a nagging sense it was off.
There is a contrived quality to some of the interactions that feel less like characters than set ups for punchlines. The movie does have a running theme around language, and the kinds of words we use (sometimes incorrectly), but it felt a little on the nose at times.
I was ready to put that aside because even these pieces were working on me.
Sometimes being aware of the mechanics can work against a good viewing - sometimes it is part of the experience.
With Bodies Bodies Bodies, it felt a little rickety, but any quibbles I had were extinguished by the ending.
A fun movie that works great with an audience, Bodies Bodies Bodies is a good time.
Tuesday, 8 November 2022
Roger Moore returns to espionage: Fire, Ice and Dynamite & Bullseye!
On the latest episode, we continue our survey of the six year gap between Licence to Kill and GoldenEye with reviews of two 1990 releases starring Roger Moore, Fire, Ice and Dynamite & Bullseye!
OUT NOW: Run Sweetheart Run
It has taken a while for her to get some follow up vehicles. This movie has been floating around since 2020 - I remember it making the festival circuit just before the pandemic hit.
The premise sounded great - a lo-fi cat-and-mouse chase thriller. I recently watched the 2007 thriller P2, which is a cat-and-mouse thriller about a professional woman trying to escape the underground parking lot under her building, and Run Sweetheart Run felt like a contemporary spin on a similar idea.
While it starts that way, Run Sweetheart Run is not the film I thought it was going to be.
I want to give this movie credit for ambition - writer-director Shana Feste puts a lot of different ideas into the movie. It looks great, and has a solid sense of atmosphere.
It is also weirdly inconsistent, and loses steam as it heads into the home stretch.
Part of it is personal taste - I am not the biggest fan of supernatural horror, unless it is juxtaposed with some sense of grounding.
Our villain is revealed as a supernatural antagonist fairly early, but there is a weird lack of rules to his powers. At points he seems to have power over the film itself - at two specific points he looks directly at the camera and bars it/us from seeing what he is about to do.
But aside from those two examples, this breaking of the fourth wall is as far as the device goes. The only other non-diegetic element is the recurring appearance of ‘Run!’ plastered as text across the frame.
This plot development feels a little distended from the rest of the movie - it feels like the movie has turned into a superhero film, with a hidden society, a super-powered mentor (Shohreh Aghdashloo) and a training sequence.
Monday, 7 November 2022
Vesper (Kristina Buozyte and Bruno Samper, 2022)
Life is tough but routine - until a ship from the Citadel, a city state where the wealthy few live in comfort, crashlands nearby.
Seeing a potential escape for her and her father, Vesper brings the only survivor (Rosy McEwen) home to convalesce.
But her new guest has a secret that makes Vesper a target for the Citadel and her tyrannical uncle Jonas (Eddie Marsan)…
Anchored by Rafiella Chapman’s superb performance, Vesper is a strong addition to the post-apocalyptic genre.
Directed by Kristina Buozyte and Bruno Samper, Vesper manages to evoke a wider world without showing a lot. There are some visual effects, but most of this future is created from set design and evocative locations.
The film’s apocalypse is based on environmental contamination - this world is swampy and filled with new and dangerous plants, the products of man’s attempt to genetically evolve beyond climate change.
The film is beautifully photographed by Feliksas Abrukauskas, with lots of soft light and muted colour palette, evoking a world that is not necessarily dying, but transforming into something new and alien.
One of the most striking aspects of Vesper’s design aesthetic is its visualisation of technology is more organic than mechanical - when Jonas sabotages Darius’s drone, its innards are a mass of pulsating tissue.
Chapman’s performance - taciturn yet with the naïveté and excitement of youth, is the pulsing heart of the movie.
Brake, Marsan and McEwen provide solid support, but for most of the movie, we are following Vesper as she charts her way through this world alone.
Thematically, Vesper is familiar in its coming-of-age narrative - in the end, she has to learn to let go and begins to think differently.
More importantly, the dramatic construction is solid and prevents the film from being an exercise in production design.
The film’s resolution is boosted by what follows.
In an extended, wordless coda, she becomes the leader of a new community of children. She follows the mysterious pilgrims to finally learn what they are doing. And she finally makes a choice to reject the false promise of the Citadel.
Narratively, Vesper is not that original but that is irrelevant. Good performances and a strong sense of world-building make Vesper worth a look.







