Wednesday, 20 November 2024

OUT NOW: Gladiator II (Ridley Scott, 2024)

16 years after the death of Maximus, Rome is under the collective boot of twin emperors Geta (Joseph Quinn) and Caracalla (Fred Hechinger).


A wealthy arms dealer, Macrinus (Denzel Washington), buys a new gladiator, Hanno (Paul Mescal), who he sees as the key to bringing the emperors, and the entire empire, under his control.



I remember reading an Empire review of Gladiator which came out in 2004/2005, right after the wave of epic movies it influenced (Troy, King Arthur, Alexander etc) had not been able to replicate its success at the box office.


The author noted the key difference between those movies and their inspiration was how simple Gladiator’s story was.


It is a movie about one man’s vengeance.


Maximus’s family are murdered by Commodus. He finds Commodus and murders him. Fin.


I am not the biggest fan of Gladiator - I am not sure I have watched the movie in about 20 years - but that point always stuck with me.


And it was all I could think about watching Gladiator II.


 I always found the happy ending of the original a little simplistic.


At the time the movie came out, I was deep into Roman history, so when the film ends with a re-founding of the Republic, I rolled my nerdy eyes.


In its very DNA, Gladiator II seems to agree.


This film is far more cynical about politics and human nature than its predecessor. It reminded me of Ridley Scott’s last sequel, Alien Covenant.


Like the first film, this is a story about revenge. But it is also about power - what it is, how it is used and how it corrupts.


The key conflict in the movie is between the cynicism of this film and the idealism of its predecessor - both within the text, and without. It is hard to view the film as a reflection of the very different contexts of the nineties and the very different context of the 2020s.


This clash is emphasised even more by constant flashbacks to key moments from the first movie.


The movie is at war with itself.


Star Paul Mescal cannot help but stand in Russell Crowe’s shadow. This is no disrespect to the man who has been getting great notices for other movies.


Frankly, his role is a blank. Not terrible, but it feels like a poor facsimile of Maximus.


And he is not helped by being in scenes with Denzel Washington.


As the ultimate villain of the piece, a former gladiator-turned-power broker, Washington powers up the movie every time he slinks onscreen.


Grinning and dead-eyed, he gives the movie a sense of forward momentum. He is Maximus’s true successor, using his talents and new wealth to manipulate and coerce the corrupt Roman machine until he is at its controls.


Charismatic and funny, he also comes across as more at ease within the genre - he makes the faux Shakespearean dialogue sing.


The movie is at its best as Gladiator’s younger, scummier brother - and Washington almost makes it worth it.


One wishes the film had found a way to sidestep Mescal’s story - every time he is foregrounded, it feels like an echo of the older film. Even when the film makes some interesting twists to complicate his journey, Washington’s presence is a constant reminder of what this movie’s real strengths are.





Wednesday, 13 November 2024

OUT NOW: Venom - The Last Dance (Kelly Marcel, 2024)

After the events of the last movie, Eddie Brock (Tom Hardy) and Venom (Tom Hardy) face their greatest threat...


The first Venom was an accidental miracle - as a straight superhero movie it was a failure. As an odd couple comedy featuring a movie star in both lead roles, it was weirdly perfect.


The sequel found its groove by adopting the structure of a romantic comedy, with our heroes falling apart and coming back together to defeat a seemingly perfect pair of villainous lovers.


After an entry that felt like it had reduced the franchise to its key elements, The Last Dance seems to have ignored all the lessons learned from its predecessors.


Where Part 2 was almost too simple, this one is cluttered with mythology and subplots.


The bad guy is undefined, its minions are unkillable and the military antagonist is played by someone (Chiwetel Ejiofor) overqualified for the role.


As with the previous movies, the film’s pleasures come from scenes of Tom Hardy talking to each other.


The film is at its best when it is a road movie, with our heroes bouncing off of each other. When the movie is just about these characters babbling at each other, it is kind of compelling.


There is less conflict between the couple, but there is an energy and a shagginess to their interactions that is far more interesting than any of the traditional blockbuster stuff.


Venom - The Last Dance makes some feeble moves toward being about the end of the central relationship.


Hardy brings the pathos with a side of ham, but the story around him is so dull and fast-paced that there is no sense of catharsis.


A banal end to a beautiful friendship.


Related

If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Tuesday, 12 November 2024

The Specialist (Luis Llosa, 1994)

In this season of The James Bond Cocktail Hour podcast, we are covering the six year gap between Licence to Kill and GoldenEye, covering everything James Bond-related, from books to comics to video games, to non-Bond properties which tried to fill the gap.


We dodge bombs and check out the rather Bond-esque score from John Barry in 1994's The Specialist!

Check out the episode at the link below:



























Edge of Darkness: Compassionate Leave

Edge of Darkness: Into the Shadows

Edge of Darkness: Burden of Proof

Edge of Darkness: Breakthrough

Edge of Darkness: Northmoor 

Edge of Darkness: Fusion









If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!   

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull (Steven Spielberg, 2008)

In 1957, Indiana Jones (Harrison Ford) is forced back into action when a Soviet agent‘s (Cate Blanchett) mission to find a mysterious artefact puts an old friend in danger…



I have not watched this movie since it came out.


I cannot remember how I felt about it then, but the public rejection which followed probably played a role.


What a fun movie.


Even with the CG rodent in the first shot, the opening set piece is so well-staged and shot.


There is a frivolity and an ease to the way Spielberg juxtaposes the initial race between the military trucks and the teenagers that sets the mood: this is a lark.


You can also feel the filmmaker’s joy in rediscovering this mode.


The introduction of Indy and the villains 


The set piece which follows is pure Spielberg cause and effect, with a unity of camera movement and action choreography that stands up with the iconic sequences from the previous movies.


What stood out to me was how well-paced it was.


The punchline of Indy surviving via a fridge feels like an intentional bit of self-awareness, particularly with the shot of Indy backlit by a mushroom cloud:


Our hero is a man out of time.


It says something that that one shot carried more weight than any of the navel-gazing in Indy 5.


The father-son dynamic is flawed, and the conception/performance of Mutt is misjudged, but those elements aside, the film has such elan it is hard not to get swept up.


The movie loses a bit of steam once we get to the jungle: Mac’s (Ray Winstone) various about-faces grow tiresome, and this is the first movie with an unsatisfying villain death.


Conceptually, having the villain’s brain overload is a great follow-up to Last Crusade’s instant-ageing, but the execution is toothless. 


Overall, a solid adventure yarn. Everyone seems game and energised, and on this viewing it felt like the franchise still had something in the tank.


Definitely worth a critical reappraisal.


Related


Raiders of the Lost Ark 


Temple of Doom 


Dial of Destiny


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Saturday, 2 November 2024

BITE-SIZED: Late Night with the Devil (Cameron Cairnes, Colin Cairnes, 2023)

 In a bid to boost ratings, a struggling late night show brings on an exorcist and a young woman who claims to be possessed.


I was really looking forward to Late Night with the Devil.


I left feeling underwhelmed - it feels like a better idea than in execution.


Some of the seventies trappings are great - the live band, the corny repartee, even the inter-titles.


David Dastmalchian is great in the lead - riding the line between empathetic and fame-hungry monster.


The possession does not quite carry off the build-up - for one, the look and behaviour is too familiar, resembling the iconography from The Exorcist.


Maybe it is a reference to fit with the seventies milieu, but it feels generic.


It does not quite capture the aesthetics of TV, and it never quite feels as spontaneous as a live broadcast.


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

The Burning (Tony Maylam, 1981)

After being disfigured in a prank-gone-wrong, former camp caretaker Cropsy (Lou David) returns to Camp Blackfoot to enact his revenge...

When I was growing up and first reading about the slasher genre, The Burning was a title that kept coming up.


After 2017, it gained new infamy when producer Harvey Weinstein was accused of multiple incidences of sexual assault, including by people involved in the making of this film. It is impossible to talk about this movie without the prism of the Weinsteins. Not only is The Burning the first Miramax production, but both brothers have screenplay credit.


Because of those revelations, I put this movie on the backburner.


Almost a decade later, it is impossible to watch the film with that knowledge in mind - particularly when it starts with a minor character (Brian Backer’s Alfred) who gets caught creeping on girls in the showers.


Waiting to catch up with The Burning did it some service. Particularly since when I did finally watch it, I had binged the first eight Friday the 13th movies.


There is a lot to like about the movie on its own terms. But it makes for an interesting comparison with the Jason movies, particularly the early instalments.


The most obvious difference is scope. In the early Friday movies, Camp Crystal Lake is abandoned. 


In The Burning the camp is operational, giving the action a real sense of jeopardy as the counsellors have to take care of the kids as well as each other.


Like My Bloody Valentine, the film benefits from a level of regional specificity. In this case, it features a cast of distinctly New York actors. Even though it does not affect the archetypes they are playing, their look, accents and even clothes, give the whole enterprise a unique feel.


Tony Maylam’s direction is effective, and occasionally distinctive.


There is some POV shots, but the killer is mostly shown in elliptical montages: 

Gloves, shears, the back of his head. He is an otherworldly, supernatural figure.


There is a sense of escalating chaos and encirclement that feels organic - a slow-building sense that our heroes are not in control.


And once the killer attacks the counsellors (in the film’s most memorable set piece), the film starts to feel like a siege narrative.


Even before Cropsy appears, there is a grim undertone to the piece, a sense that too many of these people do not like anyone they are with.


To the film’s credit, the lion’s share of scumbags get hacked to bits first.


Cropsy chalks up an impressive body count, which feels like a reaction to other slashers.


There is an interesting strain of empathy to the movie that feels distinctive: after the iconic raft set piece, there is an extended scene of the campers, traumatised, reacting to the raft.


Instead of a final girl, we get a pair of Final Boys, who are forced to face Cropsy by fate, rather than chance.


It is revealed that Todd, our supposedly clean-cut hero, was involved in Cropsy’s disfigurement. He is forced to join forces with Alfred - the character introduced peeping on girls. Facing the killer becomes an act of redemption for both of them.


Darker than the Friday the 13th movies in tone, The Burning also boasts a more gothic atmosphere.


Cropsy’s lair is a striking piece  of art design: a disused mineshaft filled with dark shadows broken by shafts of light.


This environment is the one place where we get a good look at Cropsy, and where he is presented as a human man.


While he does die, the film does not end - instead it ends on a campfire re-telling of Cropsy’s story.


Cropsy is now immortal.


Related









If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.