Saturday, 6 December 2025

Let The Right One In (Tomas Alfredson, 2008)

Young Oskar (Kåre Hedebrant) finds his life upended when a new child, Eli (Lina Leandersson), moves into his apartment building...


Let The Right One In is one of the rare movies to become an instant favourite after I first saw it. 


In September 2023, I finally got to see it on the big screen.


I was planning to produce this review shortly thereafter, but any thoughts or feelings from that screening evaporated shortly thereafter. 


I had developed feelings for someone and a few days after the screening, I confessed my feelings. They did not feel the same way. Such is life. 

Suddenly the ambiguous attachment between the central characters was infused with my own feelings of confusion and depression.


I cannot think of any similarities between the film and my experience (we are adults and neither of us is a vampire), but now I cannot think about this movie without chrono-locking to that moment.


The time away was probably a benefit to my appraisal of the film. 


Going back to the film now, l am fascinated by how delicate the film’s balance of elements is.


When I first watched it back in the early 2010s, I thought of the film as naturalistic, as the most believable portrayal of vampirism I had ever seen.


Nothing could be further from the truth.


Hoyte Van Hotyema’s chilly, muted colour palette and wide, isolating compositions are far from documentary. 


Instead the film is an exercise in minimalism, focusing on the most specific and essential elements of its world to evoke the emotional states of its characters.


The film’s focus on ellipses and inference remains a delight: Oskar’s interest in violent crime; Eli’s motives; the nature of Eli’s relationship with her familiar Håkan (Per Ragnar).


This extends to the queer subtext running through the film, from Oskar’s father is living in the country with his boyfriend, to the rejection of a sexual/gender binary in the lead characters’ central bond.


One of the most enduring elements of the film is that Oskar and Eli have no anxieties about their relationship.


The film feels like a fairytale - a small story, about innocence, or lack thereof.


The two child performances remain electric: as Oskar, Kåre Hedebrant initially comes across as a familiar type: a naive, lonely boy with an active imagination.


While he is a shrinking wallflower, he is never positioned as a stereotypical ‘good’ kid. Instead, he is a loner who is interested in true crime and weapons. He is bullied at school, and fantasises about how he can fight back.


There is a pleasing lack of sentiment to the character, balanced with a childlike sense of optimism. 


Eli - performed by Lina Leandersson and dubbed by Elif Ceylan - is a remarkable sphinx of a character: wistful, knowing of aspects of the world while innocent about others.


She is both the site of the film’s terrors and empathy.


Filled with iconic scenes - the extended shot in the pool; Håkan, cornered in the locker room, realising that he is done for - the film never feels like a formalist exercise. There is a quiet humanity to the film’s portrayal of its characters, a refusal to treat them as pure archetypes.


At points, it feels like you are in Oskar’s position - powerless and somewhat ignorant of the outside world. The camera is often positioned at a child’s eye level with a shallow depth of field.


The adult world is treated at a remove - their helplessness conveyed in wide, long shots.


I am vaguely interested in rewatching then American remake. I watched it around the same time as the original, but it did not leave much of an impression.


A beautiful film.


Related


Dracula (1931 Anglo version)


Dracula (1931 Spanish version) 


Horror of Dracula (1958)


Count Dracula (1977)


Dracula (1979)


Bram Stoker's Dracula


The Last Voyage of the Demeter


Nosferatu (2024)


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!

Night of the Living Dead (George Romero, 1968)

The dead have come back to life - and they are very hungry.

As the walking corpses gather outside, a group of survivors barricade themselves in an isolated farmhouse, waiting for the nightmare to end…



One of the key horror texts.

I do not know if I can add anything. 

Because of its status, I took it for granted for decades. I only watched it for the first time earlier this year.

Because its conventions have become so foundational, you have to keep reminding yourself that this film invented the modern understanding of zombies as flesh-eating ghouls.

The film is completely contemporary. There is nothing supernatural attached to the rise of the dead.

Experienced with making industrial films, Romero applies a similar sensibility to his debut feature, bringing Elements of cinema verite that adds to the film’s disturbing sense of verisimilitude.

Indeed, there is no real explanation for the outbreak beyond some sound-bytes about a probe returning from Venus.

Released a year after the Production Code was finally put in the grave, this film breaks with conventions of the time - our assumed lead (Judith O’Dea’s Barbara) is rendered catatonic, with the central role taken by Ben (Duane Jones).

The first black lead of an American horror film, Jones’s Ben finds himself struggling against the people inside the farmhouse as much as the ghouls outside.

His casting adds another dynamic to the ensemble, particularly the interactions between Ben and Cooper (Karl Hardman), a WASP who attempts to present himself as the figure of authority - he is a cowardly blowhard with bad ideas.

The third act is a glorious rug pull.

Once the group' s escape plan fails, they fall apart.

Ben beats Cooper for abandoning him and shoots him dead. 

Barbara is carried away by her undead brother, in a gruesome parody of embrace (which also reinforces the incestual subtext of the siblings’ early interactions).

The Cooper’s little girl, who has been kept safe in the basement, has transformed into one of the undead. Breaking yet another taboo, she feasts on her father and murders her mother.

The final tragedy is Ben’s fate - murdered by the cavalry riding to the rescue.

The film ends with the zombies vanquished, but at what cost?

The outbreak may be contained but Ben’s death highlights the ways in which this sense of safety feels illusionary. Despite the confident tone of the film’s no-nonsense news anchors attempting to conclude the story, this lack of closure would be expanded upon in Romero’s Dawn of the Dead, released ten years later…

If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!

The Swimmer (Frank Perry, 1968)

During an impromptu visit to a friend’s pool, Ned Merrill (Burt Lancaster) has a sudden epiphany - all the properties between his friend’s home and his own have pools.


He can swim his way home.


As Ned’s strange journey progresses, he swims into his neighbours’ lives, and the purpose behind his obsession begins to fall apart…



Bizarre, fascinating, unsettling and so annoyingly obvious in equal measure, The Swimmer is one of those movies where the more I write about it, the more I want to watch it again.


Based on a short story by John Cheever, the movie is an allegorical psychodrama of one man’s journey into his own self.


Released as the clash of generations came to a head at the end of the Sixties, the film feels like a mirror of the coming end of the postwar boom.


These people are wealthy and empty.


Perfectly cast, Burt Lancaster stands out as the most physically impressive of his muddled aged friends.


Athletic and sexually forward, openly flirting with every woman he sees, Ned seems to be more alive and chaotic than his staid surroundings.


As the film progresses from pool to pool, his Boheme becomes more static, his smile too forced, his eyes sparkling with a mania.


What could have looked like a celebration of the aging star’s virility never settles.


Lancaster is fantastic. Everything that makes him slightly outsized - the charm and too-wide smile - is pushed too far.


As he interacts with more people, there is a growing disconnect between the way he acts and the way his new scene partners do.


Something is wrong with this man. He seems completely disconnected from whoever he is interacting with - making the same repetitive statements about his family, while his attempts at schmoozing seem far more conniving.


I am torn on Marvin Hamlisch’s score - like Lancaster, it mirrors his detachment from the context around him.


Sometimes it feels like a case of Mickey mousing, aping the action onscreen.


Other times it feels like Hamlisch is trying to overdo it, working against the tone.


The Swimmer was Hamlisch’s debut as a film composer, and it makes for an interesting pairing with his penultimate score, The Informant!, Steven Soderbergh’s more satirical take on a man detached from reality.


Directed by Frank Perry, with significant reshoots directed by Sydney Pollack, The Swimmer never gets bogged done.


Some of the allegory feels a shade obvious - but that is down to the emphasis on dialogue.


I put this down to personal taste, wanting the film to be a shade more elliptical. But the dialogue is effective - people talk around their problems until Ned meets people who do not care about niceties.


Lancaster’s physique turns from an object of spectacle into a vulnerability.


Limping along a highway, stumbling through the shower of a crowded public pool - suddenly he is presented as he is, not a suburban stud but a troubled old man tilting at his own peculiar crusade.


The scene with the pool employee demanding that he take a shower before swimming is a final signifier of his collapse in status, and the puncturing of his confidence - he has breezed through other people’s lives without being concerned about the consequences.


Now he is grounded.


The ending is the film’s saving grace. Even with all its strengths, I had a nagging feeling the film was not going to pull it off.


But then Lancaster stumbles into his own property, and any criticisms that had been brewing washed away. 


His home is closed and boarded up, the grounds overgrown. And the weather, once bright sunshine, has turned to dark skies and heavy rain.


It is a final Gothic lurch that is the movie finally finding a tenor to match Lancaster’s out-sized delusions.


Instead of the virile outsider of his square friends, Ned is an extreme version of their own vacuousness, with his idyllic life ultimately revealed to just be an illusion.


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!