Prime among these various miscreants is Roman Sionis (Ewan McGregor), a minor crime boss who is making a major play to become the kingpin of Gotham's underworld. To do this he needs a diamond that has been stolen by a young pickpocket, Cassandra Cain (Ella Jay Basco).
Seeing a way out of her predicament, Harley agrees to join the hunt for the young girl.
Hijinks ensues.
What I really liked was the way the movie walked the line between the anarchy of Harley Quinn and centring her as a protagonist going through a major emotional journey. There are elements of this journey that do not quite land, but let's focus on the good stuff first.
I have not seen Suicide Squad, and I do not really intend to. Birds of Prey clearly recognises this and gives the viewer a neat little animated prologue that gives us the meat of Harley's life with the Joker, without ever showing the green haired one onscreen.
The movie is all about women overcoming the patriarchal forces in their lives - not just Harley's toxic ex, but Renee Montoya (Rosie Perez) has to deal with her successful busts stolen by her chief; Black Canary (Jurnee Smollett-Bell) is under the thumb of her boss; and Cassandra Cain (Ella Jay Basco) .
The first time I watched the movie, I was a little underwhelmed by the scrambled chronology of the first act, but it worked on second viewing. It adds to the sense that this is Harley's story, and she is losing track of important details.
As referenced in a previous review, one of my favourite comic book movies is Batman Returns, and a lot of that movie's power comes from the portrayal of Catwoman/Selina
Kyle by Michelle Pfieffer. In a movie filled with outsiders, she feels like the
genuine article – neither hero or villain, she feels like a fully dimensional
woman and an over-the-top agent of chaos. She manages to have both
pathos and fun.
It is a hard balance to strike -particularly nowadays, when filmmakers
seem to confuse drama with anti-fun (i.e. the DCEU pre-Justice League).
With Harley Quinn, you have a similar conundrum: how do you balance the story
of a woman overcoming trauma and taking control of her life, while also holding
true to the character’s sense of anarchy and whimsy.
While the balance never quite reaches those heights, BoP’s
version of Harley Quinn is pretty fun, and Robbie handles the character’s pain
without trivialising it for easy laughs. For this character, like Pfieffer’s
Catwoman, anarchy is a release.
Unlike her ex-boyfriend, her chaotic schemes and pranks start from
specific needs: The destruction of Acme Chemicals is a way to signal her
freedom, and her attack on the police station is a way to get her out of a jam.
While Harley’s staggered growth is centred, the title characters manage
to hold their own. Because the movie orbits around Quinn, the title characters
get less screen-time. In a certain sense, the movie (especially in its final
third) feels like a pilot for a TV show. They are all involved in variations of
Quinn’s plight which does bring them together, but it does feel a tad
perfunctory. If there is a disappointment to the movie, it is that there are
not more of their adventures available to watch (yet).
As Montoya, Rosie Perez offsets the cliché of the tough cop with wit and
empathy. She also gives the role a physicality that makes her a believable
opponent for the other characters. She ends up being the rock-solid foundation
for the wilder antics of Quinn and the BS Montoya has to put up with from her
male colleagues on the force.
It is great to see Perez in this movie in such a big role. I was impressed that all the actresses (aside from Robbie) were not in
their 20s. There something refreshing about getting to see a broader range of women getting involved genre fare like this, and they are not consigned to specific parts of the film's palette - each of them is a specific kind of action hero, with their own specific strengths, and all the characters are funny, in ways that are specific to their characters.
Obvious stuff, but in Hollywood movies, this obvious stuff is rare.
Obvious stuff, but in Hollywood movies, this obvious stuff is rare.
The casting of Birds of Prey is the most obvious example of how this movie conceptualizes the women at its heart, and how it not interested in turning them into the hyper-masculine action heroines. If they do, the filmmakers highlight the cliché (Montoya) or perform some light revisionism in their portrayal (Huntress).
As the film’s lone masked vigilante, Mary Elizabeth Winstead plays
Huntress as an awkward loner, who is so focused on her mission that she
has already built a mythology around her persona that only she knows – everyone
else has different ideas of who she is (and what her nickname is). There is a
version of this movie in which this character is foregrounded and treated as a
cool badass. In this movie, she’s a weirdo in a hoodie. A badass, but still a
bit of a weirdo.
In a different way, Jurnee Smollett-Bell’s Black
Canary feels like an obvious action heroine. She may be hard as nails, but for
most of the movie, she is reluctant to get involved. Feeding into the movie's
theme, she is also pragmatic when it comes to the people who have power over
her, like her employer Black Mask (Ewan McGregor). She sees herself as a small
fish in a big pond.
· Ella Jay Bascois also great as the no-nonsense Cassandra Cain. The script gives her a sense of agency and never reduces her to a plot point.
All the characters reflect different versions of
Harley's plight. They have all been put through the ringer by men and chewed
up. All these women are trying to break out of the roles and circumstance they
are in - even Winstead's Huntress's mission of vengeance is prompted by the
violence of men seeking power.
Unlike a lot of action/comic book movies, Birds
of Prey has some solid bad guys who serve a dramatic role that fits the
movie’s theme will also staying in keeping with the movie’s tone. It also
helps that the villain they face is formidable.
Ewan McGregor is having a great time as Black Mask. An egomaniac and a narcissist, he is deeply insecure and is constantly exposing the deep sense of resentment that he feels toward the world - particularly the women in it.
McGregor leans into the character's self-centredness. I often find his American accent forced, but here it feels like a put-on, a way to put himself over as more in control than he is.
McGregor leans into the character's self-centredness. I often find his American accent forced, but here it feels like a put-on, a way to put himself over as more in control than he is.
Even better is Chris Messina as Victor Zsasz -
paranoid and psychopathic, he possesses a quiet menace that complements
McGregor's histrionics. The great thing about this pair is that - aside from
Sionis's mask at the climax - they are just evil men. They have a creepy co-dependant
dynamic that makes them far scarier than your usual super villains.
Even though this movie does highlight the misogyny and sexism of their world, and the movie is graphically violent, there is no attempt or hint of sexual violence to the villains' actions. They just want to kill Harley and her comrades because they are obstacles to their goals.
As far as negatives go, I question the necessity for the R rating. The movie only features a few real moments of gore, but they feel out of place. There is one sequence that is specifically designed to highlight how bad the bad guys are, but it feels like a different movie. There is a scene later in the movie where Black Mask is screaming at a woman to dance on a table, and it felt far more violent and disturbing in its power dynamics than the gory execution he commits.
The other thing I questioned was one specific beat in Harley's arc. I liked the idea of superimposing Harley's abusive relationship with the Joker over her conflict with Black Mask. The only thing that I wish had more attention was the character’s low point.
The other thing I questioned was one specific beat in Harley's arc. I liked the idea of superimposing Harley's abusive relationship with the Joker over her conflict with Black Mask. The only thing that I wish had more attention was the character’s low point.
On my first viewing, I noted around the point when
Harley and Cass are hanging out in her den, the story starts to stall. My issue
was clarified on re-watch: her betrayal by her landlord lacked punch. We are
introduced to him a scene earlier, and then he betrays her. The movie does not
really spend enough time on their relationship, so his betrayal does not hit in
the way it is intended, and it feels a bit forced in how it leads to the split
between Harley and Cass.
While a key piece of connective tissue falls flat,
the film’s expression of its central theme is strong enough to push it to the
finish line. On top of that, the characters are well-drawn and get at least a scene
to themselves.
Following the superficial profundity of Joker, Birds of Prey feels like a cheeky middle finger. Whereas that movie defanged its themes and slathered itself in one-note grimness, Birds of Prey shows that you can tackle serious themes and also have fun as well.
Following the superficial profundity of Joker, Birds of Prey feels like a cheeky middle finger. Whereas that movie defanged its themes and slathered itself in one-note grimness, Birds of Prey shows that you can tackle serious themes and also have fun as well.
Related
Wonder Woman
Wonder Woman
If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour.
You can subscribe on iTunes, or wherever you get your podcasts.
No comments:
Post a Comment