Sunday, 31 August 2025

OUT NOW: The Naked Gun (Akiva Schaffer, 2025)

Frank Drebin Jr (Liam Neeson) is the star of Police Squad - until a little rule-breaking gets him bumped out of the unit, and on the outs with his boss (CCH Pounder).


Now stuck solving road accidents, Drebin’s life/career appears over - until a suspicious crash victim reactivates his old skill set…





They figured it out.


After years (decades?) without spoof movies, The Naked Gun makes it feel like they never went away.


The movie knows exactly what it is doing with Neeson, and is a prime example of how the film never feels like a straight rip of the original.


Neeson is not doing a Nielsen impression, but the performance is based on the same idea: take a dramatic actor and place him in a context that is the complete opposite of the gravitas said performer is bringing. And never wink at the audience.


The film leans into Neeson’s reputation as an action star and the inherent gravitas he brings to everything.


It does not even shy away from criticising the police - there is a bleedingly sharp gag about police shooting black people, and a hilariously vicious punchline toward the end about the lack of accountability.


The film is smart enough to understand the formula of ZAZ without repeating it - instead it uses it as a launching pad.


The gags are original and very funny.


Pamela Anderson is a fine foil as Neeson’s love interest, getting to participate in the silliness as much as her co-star.


There is one montage to a song that strains a little - a surreal detour into nineties thriller parody that feels a little too broad.


The gag rate might be nearly as high as the original but they never stop trying - and they are actual jokes, played dead seriously by people who know better than to wink at the audience.


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!

OUT NOW: Weapons (Zach Creggar, 2025)

When students from a single class go missing, the town of Maybrook turns on the class’s teacher, Ms. Gandy (Julia Garner).


As tensions rise, Gandy struggles to work out what happened, and turns her attention to the one student (Cary Christopher) who made it to class that fateful day…



Barbarian was one of my favourite movies of the last few years - and I still cannot believe it has not gotten a physical release.


Such a tightly controlled thriller, with an amazing - I’ll keep it vague - shift midway through. I was primed for whatever Zach Creggar made next. 


The hook for Weapons is one of the strongest I have seen in a while - it immediately stabs into a deep primal fear: the loss of a child, not in terms of death, but disappearance. The uncanny, uncontrollable terror that this film sets out is so vivid that it overwhelms the ultimate effect of the movie. 


The hook of this movie might be so strong it is possible there was no way for it to live up to its opening.


I was trying to come up with parallels for how I felt, and the closest I could think of was early John Carpenter. Weapons feels like John Carpenter’s The Fog, in that it is the more ambitious, large-scale follow-up to a more contained thriller (Halloween).


It moves between multiple characters’ perspectives, drawing us closer to unveiling the mystery. And like Carpenter’s film, it comes across as a little scattered, building suspense in stops and starts.


There is a collection of scenes and moments, but it does not have the cumulative power perhaps intended - although the third act freak-out is terrific.


By the end, I am not exactly sure what it is building to.


There is something potent to the idea of the old preying on the younger generation - but it feels half-baked. 


Maybe my expectations were too high - it is definitely worth a rewatch. The cast (particularly Julia Garner and Josh Brolin) are solid. I appreciated how spiky Garner’s take on the central teacher is - while the film aligns us with her perspective for a portion of the film, there is no attempt made to make her some kind of perfect victim or a steroetypical final girl. She is a mess, drinking constantly and trying to seduce her married ex, all the while trying to figure out the mystery. 


There are things to like in Weapons. But it always feels like it never quite taps all the potential of its premise.


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!

Who’s First?: An Unearthly Child (Doctor Who, 1963)

This is the first of hopefully a series of reviews of the classic era of Doctor Who (1963-1989).


Introduction

I am not a Who fan, but the series has always interested me. I read a book about the 70s era of the programme as a teen, and it was interesting n.


This was before the 2005 relaunch, and before I had an income to start exploring. My access to the older episodes was the same as the generation before me - the novelisations.


I remember reading a couple - the two I can remember were the first two Auton stories, with the Third Doctor.


I watched the first episode of the new show. It did not stick with me so I let the show pass me by.


During the pandemic, I was looking for things to watch and I binged Peter Capaldi’s final season.


The main barrier for me was the volume of Who available. This is generally why I prefer to focus on analysing movies rather than TV.


Format

Because of the sheer number of episodes, I decided a chronological binge was out of the question.


I could see myself losing interest, and missing out on experiencing the sheer variety the series had to offer.


I decided to do a curation using a couple of different rules:


  1. Select stories with some level of regard by critics and fans. This felt like a good way to find entry points into the series.

  2. Review stories with complete existing episodes. At least for this initial series of reviews, I wanted to get a sense of what these stories looked and sounded like.

  3. Review one story from each Doctor in a row - this would enable me to get a feel for each of the performers and their respective eras.


Like the series, these rules are not hard and fast and probably subject to change. I also feel like jumping between the different Doctors and decades will make the whole experience more exciting and - hopefully - unexpected for readers.


So let’s go back to 1963, and a foggy London junkyard…



Concerned about new student Susan Foreman (Carol Anne Ford), teachers Ian (William Russell) and Barbara (Jacqueline Hill) follow her home.


Their suspicions increase when Susan disappears into a nearby junkyard.


While searching for the girl,  they stumble into a strange old man, the Doctor (William Hartnell), who is trying to get into a police box…


All the technical limitations should be taken with a grain of salt.


I would argue they add to the show’s vibe.


The feedback loops of the main titles and Delia Derbyshire’s music are a potent, magical combination that even worked on a non-fan like me.


It feels like you are being beamed something from the unconscious - like one of those broadcasts from John Carpenter’s They Live.


Human companions Ian and Barbara are not just bystanders but fully active participants.


And Susan - played with just the right level of heightened emotion by Ford - feels so disconcertingly human.


Her emotional vulnerability and open empathy make for an interesting contrast with Hartnell, and make their unseen race seem even more dynamic and interesting. 


I left the serial with more questions because of how recognisably human Susan was.


Episode One of An Unearthly Child is great scene-setting.


We open with the reveal of the police box in a junkyard, appearing out of the fog.


This first episode takes pains to set up the juxtaposition of the ordinary and the alien. We are introduced to the Doctor and his world through Ian and Barbara - seemingly ordinary people.


The uncanny nature of the police box is subtly foregrounded when- Ian walks around it while searching for Susan. It is a lovely bit of misdirection for the reveal of its true nature. 


The Doctor himself, a mysterious and remote figure - comes off as evasive and aloof.


Hartnell is fantastically unpredictable, giving this figure an almost diabolical edge. 


But the most intriguing element for this viewer was Susan.


As someone familiar with the basic format, Susan is fascinating. 


 Functionally, as a child character, she is meant to act as an entry point for young viewers.


As a family member of the titular character, she brings a unique dynamic to the Doctor-companion relationship. She brings a sense of knowledge and personal history, 


William Russell’s Ian is also higher status than I was expecting. He does not believe what is going on, and there seems to be genuine animosity between the characters.  


The first episode is so strong, the actual story is a little bit of a downbeat.


The conflict between the tribesmen is efficiently established, with some effective ratcheting up of tension with strong cliffhangers.  


Because it is so early in the series run, the conception of the doctor is remarkable for how vulnerable he is: 


He seems genuinely unsure of himself, and does not cover up with bluster. At one point, a tribesman gets the drop on him. And there is a shocking moment where he attempts to murder a wounded man. He even refers to the tribe as savages.


That lack of empathy is remarkable considering how much curiosity seems to play into the later characterisations of the Doctor. 


The serial itself seems to share the character’s disdain, regarding the tribe as callous and self-serving - they appear unaware of empathy and friendship.


A fascinating, embryonic introduction to the Doctor, An Unearthly Child is worth a look. It is made with such care and intelligence it still carries a certain raw power. 


One can feel the potential of the concept, the blank canvas waiting to be filled.


Technically rough but uncanny - the opening titles and musical theme are inspired, creating an otherworldly atmosphere setting the stage for innumerable adventures.. 


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!



NZIFF: Angels Egg (Mamoru Oshii & Yoshitaka Amano, 1985)


Some years at the New Zealand International Film Festival I manage to see everything I want to see.


There are a bunch of titles that I will get around to.


Between work and volunteering at the festival, my options were limited.


Thankfully, this film turned out to be worth it.


Around the time the Animatrix was released, a box set was released featuring three key anime influences: Akira, Ninja Scroll and Ghost in the Shell.


This box set was my real introduction to anime. Of the trio, Ghost probably made the least impact on my teenage brain.


I found the plotting so complex, I was distracted from the film’s themes. It is a film I am keen to revisit - particularly after watching this film.


Made about a decade before Ghost in the Shell, Angels Egg is the opposite of plot-driven.


Impressionistic, with little dialogue, Angels Egg plays like a poem or a dream.


Filled with nightmarish, post-apocalyptic landscapes, the film plays like a quest narrative - without any clear sense of catharsis.


This is a dead world, a barren place where armed men patrol and hunt for fish which are only shadows (one of the film’s standout sequences).


The only vague chance is the titular egg, cared for by a young girl. She is the one sliver of hope, a nurturer where every other character we meet is armed for war.


I cannot say I fully understood it, but I loved watching it.


Barely seventy minutes long, it never outstays its welcome - and leaves the viewer with plenty to ponder.


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!