Saturday, 6 September 2025

BITE-SIZED: Class of 1999 (Mark L. Lester, 1990)

In the future, adolescent crime has become such a major issue that the government has developed a new, lethal solution to pacify the youth: Killer androids disguised as teachers.


This movie is the kind of genre mishmash I used to love. I still like them but I was absolutely obsessed with these kinds of movies as a kid. It felt freeing, realising there are no rules.


The best example of this type of movie is something like A Chinese Ghost Story, which manages to juggle multiple tones and genres with ease.


The opposite is something like Suburbicon - where it feels like different parts of the movie are battling each other.


Class of 1999 is not that well-written, or acted, or that thought out. But my god is it entertaining.


This film is technically a thematic sequel to Class of 1984, a more straightforward action drama about a teacher (Perry King) turning vigilante when a gang of bad kids attack his family.


I have not watched it in years. I do not remember it making much of an impression beyond the credit song by Alice Cooper (‘We Are The Future’).


Class of 1999 takes the barest inspiration form it’s predecessor - a gang of school kids battling teachers in a school - and goes absolutely ham.


The kids are styled like the marauders from a Mad Max movie; the robotic teachers are clear take-offs on the Terminator (hilariously the villains’ hidden weapons would be replicated in the third Terminator sequel).


 If I wanted to break this movie down in terms of storytelling and characterisation, there is a lot to criticise. I do not want to do that - see the previous paragraphs.


The one criticism I do have is that the actors playing the robotic teachers (blaxploitation star Pam Grier, John P. Ryan and Patrick Kirkpatrick) have not come up with a shared idea of robotic behaviour. They are all kind of on their own.


Ryan is the standout as the old school disciplinarian. Armed with pipe and the piercing blue eyes, he is the stereotype of a particular kind of educator. There is a sadistic glee to his performance which falls outside of what the character is supposed to be. 


I did not really care because he is also the best performer in the movie, and his simmering menace brings a real tension to his scenes. One could also argue the machines are reflecting the sadism of their own creators -  an early scene mentions the machines are imbued with the perspective of their creators.


The third act is terrific, as the filmmakers finally let loose with their limited effects budget. A mix of make-up, puppetry and stop-motion animation, the robots’ final rampage is magnificent, and worth the wait.


It is a total rip of the third act of The Terminator but it works.


A silly, ridiculous mess, but worth watching.


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!

Wednesday, 3 September 2025

OUT NOW: Caught Stealing (Darren Aronofsky, 2025)

After his neighbour (Matt Smith) forces him to look after his cat, Former baseball player Hank (Austin Butler) finds himself the target of said roommates’ various criminal acquaintences…



Far more melancholy than it initially appears, Caught Stealing is ultimately a bit of a damp squib.


On one hand it feels like a throwback to the post-Tarantino comedy-thrillers of the nineties - combining an OTT ensemble of characters and occasional dashes of dark wit, with a dour story of redemption.


Butler is a winning presence but he is stuck in second gear as a character himself stuck on autopilot.


The film is in this weird middle lane - too cartoonish to be real, but too sombre to be fun. 


There is also something ugly and uninspired about the storytelling, particularly a questionable death of a character of colour which acts as a catalyst for our hero to change (made more questionable by the way it is hamfistedly paralleled with the death of another character of colour). It just feels like reheated leftovers from other movies.


Butler may yet become a star - he holds the screen, has genuine chemistry with Kravitz, and seems to have a better measure of the duelling tones than the movie does.


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!

OUT NOW: Relay (David Mackenzie, 2025)

When whistleblowers change their mind, they hire Ash (Riz Ahmed). A professional go-between who acts as a facilitator between almost-whistleblowers and the powerful conglomerates they are trying to stop exposing, he lays out a deal whereby the information is not distributed to the media in exchange for the safety of the non-whistleblower. He holds onto the information as leverage and protection for all parties. 


This system has been working - until Ash gets too close to his latest client, Sarah (Lily James).


Her former employer has hired a fixer of their own (Sam Worthington) who is very interested in wrapping up all loose ends - including Sarah’s new ally…



Relay feels like some kind of salute/tip of the hat from Riz Ahmed to the Deaf community after Sound of Metal.


His character utilises the relay service to communicate with his clients, a service Deaf people can use to make phone calls by typing out what they want to say to an operator who repeats it verbatim. No numbers are kept, no conversations are recorded. It is a great conceit - if a bit unlikely for a motion picture.


But to their credit, the filmmakers pull it off.


This is a slow-burn, but it never gets bogged down.


It is so compelling, and Riz Ahmed’s performance so effective, that you do not notice the main character has not spoken for the first several scenes (I did not time it, but it seemed to be over ten minutes).


While the characters mostly communicate via the relay service (they do not come face-to-face until the third act), the film moves so smoothly between their different perspectives you never notice. 


It was so good, I was disappointed by a third act twist that feels a little tacked on.


It makes the movie a little less cookie-cutter, but it kinda reinforces the character’s paranoia, rather than allowing him to move beyond it.


Still, an effective thriller. Recommended.


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!