Wednesday, 11 November 2026

Raise the Titanic (Jerry Jameson, 1980)

On the quest for a rare element that could decide the balance of the Cold War, oceanic explorer Dirk Pitt (Richard Jordan) is enlisted to locate the largest deposit of the element - the sunken wreck of the Titanic (still undiscovered when the film was released).



I have a memory of watching the ending of this movie on TV as a child - it was years before I worked out what it was. 


Ironically, I started reading Dirk Pitt novels and did not make the connection - I am pretty sure I owned the book this film is based on, but never read it.


By the time I worked out this sequence of a sunken ship rising to the surface, and arriving in New York, was a real movie.


I did not watch it - it was lumped together with other big budget flops.


After visiting a Titanic exhibit that featured posters of various Titanic movies, I was finally intrigued enough to watch it.


Raise the Titanic is a strange artefact of a couple of different things: First, it came out five years before the ship was found, in two pieces - a fatal blow to its premise.


Second, it is the epitaph of Lew Grade’s dreams of becoming a movie mogul.


While I read a few Dirk Pitt books, I cannot remember anything about them, or the character - he likes the ocean and cars?


Raise the Titanic is a weird movie.


Beyond the titular concept, it ties in the Cold War in such a bizarre contrived way.


But then it gives over to focusing on the mechanics of finding and raising a sunken ship.


There are a few moments of attempted espionage (a spy onboard; a Soviet ship shadowing the expedition) but they are dealt with so perfunctorily - the spy is found offscreen, dismissed in a sentence.


Directed with efficiency but little imagination by Jerry Jameson, I cannot say the film is exciting - until it gets into the search for the ship.


And I was almost won over when our protagonist is forced to raise the ship ahead of schedule - a mini-sub becomes trapped on top of the wreck and Pitt has to raise it before the crew’s air runs out.


The actual raising of the Titanic is the best part of the movie - it is so good, they replay it under the credits.


A combination of miniatures, and compositing, it is surreal and haunting.


Pitt wandering through the interior of the ship is almost as effective. 


It is the one chunk of the film where it captures the strange magic of the title.


John Barry overdelivers with a haunting, majestic score, and the cast are serviceable, but aside from the titular sequence, Raise the Titanic is basically inert.  


Related



If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour. 

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!

Saturday, 7 November 2026

Legend of the 7 Golden Vampires (Roy Ward Baker and Chang Cheh, 1974)

While on an academic tour of China, Dr Van Helsing (Peter Cushing) joins forces with Hsi Ching (David Chiang) to defeat a cult known as the Seven Golden Vampires.


This puts the veteran vampire hunter on a collision course with his old foe, Dracula (John Forbes-Robertson). 



A co-production with Shaw Brothers, with action directed by the legendary Chang Cheh (One-Armed Swordsman), Legend of the 7 Golden Vampires sounds weird enough to work.


It certainly sounds more inspired than the last two films in the cycle. 


Sadly, Christopher Lee did not return. Instead, Dracula is played by John Forbes-Robertson, in strange grey fright make-up. Thankfully his screentime is limited - and did not really affect the overall experience.


I must say, when the credits started with ‘Michael Carreras and Run Run Shaw present’ I felt an immediate charge of excitement - what could these two disparate production houses, with such distinct identities, create together?


Legend of the 7 Golden Vampires is no masterpiece. But it works.


Cushing returns for the final time, here playing Van Helsing as an elder statesman. What makes his performance interesting is that Van Helsing is not an expert in the supernatural phenomena of China, and shows a humility and curiosity about his hosts’ homeland that is a fascinating and welcome addition to the character. Van Helsing is a genuine scholar, seeking out new information, and recognising the limits of his own expertise.


Shaw Brothers star David Chiang is solid as his co-lead. I wish he had a little more to do.


Un-credited co-director Chang Cheh directs the action with energy, although there is not that much invention to the choreography or the setpieces.


It is a combination of Hammer horror and Shaw Brothers martial arts, but it is not particularly original or exciting beyond the uniqueness of the combination. 


A step up from the last couple of Dracula films, but one wishes it had a little more going for it.


Related


Horror of Dracula (1958)


Brides of Dracula


Kiss of the Vampire


Dracula - Prince of Darkness


Dracula Has Risen From The Grave


Taste the Blood of Dracula


Scars of Dracula


Dracula AD 1972


The Satanic Rites of Dracula


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour. 

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!

Wednesday, 28 October 2026

BITE-SIZED: The Satanic Rites of Dracula (Alan Gibson, 1973)

Dr Van Helsing (Peter Cushing) and his niece Jessica (Joanna Lumley) join forces with London police to track members of a strange new cult led by a  mysterious figure intent on taking over the world…



At this stage of the Dracula ‘saga’, I was watching these movies with the same mindset as Christopher Lee - by contractual obligation.

 

Made by the same team behind AD 1972 as a direct sequel, this movie is trying. I just found it to be a bore.


The series was trying anything to stay relevant - here it is going for a low-budget riff on James Bond, with Dracula behind the scenes as an evil mastermind, who is developing a plague to wipe out humanity.


While the stars are back again, the film around them is more like a low-energy action thriller.


As Lee’s final appearance, it is a disappointment - caught in trees, he is immobilised before being staked.


The first film in this watch-along where I actively had to force myself to keep watching.


Related


Horror of Dracula (1958)


Brides of Dracula


Kiss of the Vampire


Dracula - Prince of Darkness


Dracula Has Risen From The Grave


Taste the Blood of Dracula


Scars of Dracula


Dracula AD 1972


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour. 

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!

Dracula AD 1972 (Alan Gibson, 1972)

Resurrected by his servant Johnny Alucard (Christopher Neame) in contemporary London, Dracula (Christopher Lee) seeks vengeance on the Van Helsing family, scholar Lorrimer (Peter Cushing) and his niece Jessica (Stephanie Beacham).



A reboot of the series, with returning stars Lee and (for the first time since 1960) Cushing, Dracula AD 1972 is a strange beast. 


Despite the familiar faces in their familiar roles, these characters are meant to be completely different from the incarnations we have seen previously.


This review is going to be a lot shorter than the previous ones - frankly, this is the point in the series where my interest and enjoyment dipped.


It starts promisingly: After opening with a high-energy confrontation between Van Helsing (this time, Lawrence) and Dracula on top of a speeding carriage, the action segues to 1972, with a shot of a plane flying overhead and the crash of an electric guitar on the score.


It is a solid entree, but once we hit the present, the film has the feel of middle-aged men trying to write for the ‘yoof’.


Our introduction to Jessica and her friends is a party (with the camera ogling a young gyrating midriff). While the elderly guests look on aghast, the young people carouse (including a couple has sex under the dining table), before the police break it up.


This scene is rather over the top, setting the kids up as rebels - but they spend the rest of the film sedately sitting in their local coffee shop. It seems like the filmmakers’ inspirations ran out fairly quickly.


Christopher Neame is the one arresting part of the film, as Dracula’s young familiar.


Johnny Alucard foregrounds the queer subtext previous films had hinted at - he chews his fingers lustily while watching Dracula bite a victim.


Once he has been turned, his own first victim is a man.


Neame manages to evoke the youthful libertine far more effectively than Ralph BAtes did in Taste the Blood of Dracula, and gives the effete killer a purring malevolence that gives the film a sliver more tension than it deserves.


It is a pity his showdown with Van Helsing is so unintentionally farcical - undone by natural light and a running shower. 

Cushing is in good form, and it is interesting to see him play an intellectual forced to become a man of action.


However, there is little to latch onto. The final fight is cursory - more should have been made of Van Helsing’s lack of experience. It is there in Cushing’s performance - he seems genuinely terrified of Lee - but there is nothing to the scene.


With a disastrous score, Dracula AD 1972 is a nothingburger of a movie. Somehow, worse than Scars. 


Related


Horror of Dracula (1958)


Brides of Dracula


Kiss of the Vampire


Dracula - Prince of Darkness


Dracula Has Risen From The Grave


Taste the Blood of Dracula


Scars of Dracula


If you are new to this blog, I also co-host a podcast on James Bond, The James Bond Cocktail Hour. 

You can subscribe on Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.


If you enjoy something I wrote, and want to support my writing, here’s a link for tips!